IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v14y2010i1p103-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Quantitative Methods as Support for Audit of the Distributed Informatics Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Marius POPA
  • Sergiu Marin CAPISIZU

Abstract

This paper highlights some issues regarding how an indicators system must be developed and used in an audit process. Distributed systems are presented from de points of view of their main properties, architectures, applications, software quality characteristics and the scope of audit process in such systems. The audit process is defined in accordance to standard ISO 19011 and the main characteristics of this process are highlighted. Before using quantitative methods in audit processes, the framework in which the indicators are built must be defined. There are presented types of indicators used in audit process and classes of measurement scale. An audit process is carried out on different levels and support indicators must be in accordance to audit object. The paper presents some requirements of the indicators depending on the level of audit.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius POPA & Sergiu Marin CAPISIZU, 2010. "Using Quantitative Methods as Support for Audit of the Distributed Informatics Systems," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 103-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:14:y:2010:i:1:p:103-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/53/10%20Popa,%20Capisizu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marius POPA & Cristian TOMA & Cristian AMANCEI, 2009. "Characteristics of the Audit Processes for Distributed Informatics Systems," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 165-178.
    2. Marius POPA, 2009. "Detection of the Security Vulnerabilities in Web Applications," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 127-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marius POPA, 2011. "Framework for Evaluation of the IT&C Audit Metrics Impact," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(4), pages 119-133.
    2. Marius POPA, 2011. "Techniques and Methods to Improve the Audit Process of the Distributed Informatics Systems Based on Metric System," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 69-78.
    3. Marius POPA, 2010. "Audit Process during Projects for Development of New Mobile IT Application," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 34-46.
    4. Gabriel Eugen Garais, 2012. "Maintenance Processes Evaluation For Distributed Applications," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(2), pages 378-388, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marius POPA, 2010. "Audit Process during Projects for Development of New Mobile IT Application," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 34-46.
    2. Ion IVAN & Claudiu BRANDAS & Alin ZAMFIROIU, 2015. "Audit Validation Using Ontologies," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(2), pages 25-33.
    3. Gabriel Eugen Garais, 2012. "Maintenance Processes Evaluation For Distributed Applications," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(2), pages 378-388, December.
    4. Cristian CIUREA, 2010. "The Informatics Audit - A Collaborative Process," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 119-127.
    5. Marius POPA, 2011. "Framework for Evaluation of the IT&C Audit Metrics Impact," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(4), pages 119-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:14:y:2010:i:1:p:103-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.