IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v21y2019i51p294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining Romania's Position in Europe According to the Optimized Global Food Security Index in 2018

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Nãftanãilã

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Odi Mihaela Zãrnescu

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Laurentia Avram

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Viorica Braga

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Robert Dragomir

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Elena Gurgu

    (Spiru Haret University)

Abstract

This article aims to analyze how the Global Food Security Index (GFSI) has evolved across the European countries for the period 2012-2018. In this respect, we have taken as a starting point the Report of Global Food Security Index 2018 as well as the scientific literature from the main stream of publications focusing on food security. The data presented were analyzed and presented statistically, on the basis of which we prepared tables relevant to the proposed goal. The aim of this research is to determine the most vulnerable countries in terms of food security. We analyzed the evolution of the Global Food Security Index for the period 2012-2018, and the subcategories of indicators underlying the determination of the overall GFSI index score: food affordability, food availability, food quality and safety. We also looked at the adjustment indicator data used to determine the GFSI index, natural resources and adaptability. The natural resources and adaptive capacity indicator measure the exposure of a country to the impact of a changing climate; its susceptibility to the risks of the natural resources and how a country adapts to these risks. When applied, it acts as an adjustment factor for countries' food security scores. The originality of the paper is to build a globally optimized index for GFSI to provide a comparative analysis of European countries in terms of food security, highlighting Romania's position in this scientific approach. The motivation for calculating the optimized global food security index lies in the fact that it has only sub-indicators contributing to significant achievements, and its refining has gone through mathematical processing that led to a more relevant hierarchy. The indicator categories selected within this article are based on the analysis conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit, Research Division of The Economist that is the world leader in global business intelligence in the above-mentioned report. On the basis of the analysis we drew conclusions regarding the food security in Romania compared to the European countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Nãftanãilã & Odi Mihaela Zãrnescu & Laurentia Avram & Viorica Braga & Robert Dragomir & Elena Gurgu, 2019. "Determining Romania's Position in Europe According to the Optimized Global Food Security Index in 2018," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(51), pages 294-294.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2814.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. CHIRIMBU, Sebastian & BURDA, Alexandru, 2013. "Modern Approaches On Defining Food Quality On The Eu Market," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 4(1), pages 59-67.
    2. Diahanna L. Post, 2006. "The Precautionary Principle and Risk Assessment in International Food Safety: How the World Trade Organization Influences Standards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1259-1273, October.
    3. ŞERBAN, Măriuţa & HURLOIU, Lăcrămioara-Rodica & ŞTEFAN, Raluca-Mariana & HURLOIU, Iulian-Ioan, 2015. "Situations referring to the organization, classification and management of economic data," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 6(3), pages 31-38.
    4. RĂDULESCU, Carmen Valentina & IOAN, Ildiko, 2011. "Air Quality In Romania. Main Pollutant Emissions And Financing Possibilities For Emission Reduction," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 2(1), pages 165-173.
    5. Debra M. Strauss, 2014. "Food Security and Safety," Natural Resource Management and Policy, in: Karinne Ludlow & Stuart J. Smyth & José Falck-Zepeda (ed.), Socio-Economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation, edition 127, chapter 8, pages 109-123, Springer.
    6. STROE, Cristina & COJANU, Silvia-Florina & MILITARU, Eva, 2010. "The Profile Of Romanian Consumer And How The Economic Crisis Impacts The Consumer'S Mentality," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 1(1), pages 29-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nathalie Gröfke & Valérie Duplat & Christopher Wickert & Brian Tjemkes, 2021. "A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Food Labelling for Environmental Sustainability: Attitudes, Perceived Barriers, and Solution Approaches towards the “Traffic Light Index”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:294 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Henk Zandvoort, 2011. "Evaluation of Legal Liability for Technological Risks in View of Requirements for Peaceful Coexistence and Progress," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 969-983, June.
    3. Daniel Adrian Gardan & Ionel Dumitru & Iuliana Petronela Gardan & Irina Elena Andronie & Cristian Uta & Mihai Andronie, 2019. "Integrating the Principles of Green Marketing by Using Big Data. Good Practices," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 258-258, February.
    4. Hartigan, James C. & McMahon, Joseph A., 2022. "A fuzzy look at a fuzzy agreement: Risk management under the WTO SPS Agreement," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 272-284.
    5. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:258 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. David Demortain, 2012. "Enabling global principle‐based regulation: The case of risk analysis in the Codex Alimentarius," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 207-224, June.
    7. Raluca M. BĂLĂ, 2014. "Structure Analysis Of The Evolution Of Private Consumption In Romania," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 181-188, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    food security; global food security index (GFSI); GFSI optimized global index; food availability; food affordability; natural resources; food quality and security.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q11 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis; Prices
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.