IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aejpol/v10y2018i3p255-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Managed Care Widen Infant Health Disparities? Evidence from Texas Medicaid

Author

Listed:
  • Ilyana Kuziemko
  • Katherine Meckel
  • Maya Rossin-Slater

Abstract

Medicaid programs increasingly finance competing, capitated managed care plans rather than administering fee-for-service (FFS) programs. We study how the transition from FFS to managed care affects high- and low-cost infants (blacks and Hispanics, respectively). We find that black-Hispanic disparities widen—e.g., black mortality and preterm birth rates increase by 15 percent and 7 percent, respectively, while Hispanic mortality and preterm birth rates decrease by 22 percent and 7 percent, respectively. Our results are consistent with a risk-selection model whereby capitation incentivizes competing plans to offer better (worse) care to low- (high-) cost clients to retain (avoid) them in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilyana Kuziemko & Katherine Meckel & Maya Rossin-Slater, 2018. "Does Managed Care Widen Infant Health Disparities? Evidence from Texas Medicaid," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 255-283, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:255-83
    Note: DOI: 10.1257/pol.20150262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pol.20150262
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=7540
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrieve=P7SPD6tQvemfjrXL3JWlt6moPTME99CI
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrieve=q5Qe4FwPUnBRelLBCVQ7IAswXDdhJKT_
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine Meckel, 2020. "Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease? Unintended Effects of Payment Reform in a Quantity-Based Transfer Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(6), pages 1821-1865, June.
    2. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    3. Lee, Ajin & Vabson, Boris, 2024. "The value of improving insurance quality: Evidence from long-run Medicaid attrition," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Kreider, Amanda R. & Layton, Timothy J. & Shepard, Mark & Wallace, Jacob, 2024. "Adverse selection and network design under regulated plan prices: Evidence from Medicaid," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Daniel Montanera & Abhay Nath Mishra & T. S. Raghu, 2022. "Mitigating Risk Selection in Healthcare Entitlement Programs: A Beneficiary-Level Competitive Bidding Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1221-1247, December.
    6. Arboleda Cárcamo, David, 2024. "Fitting a Curve to the Pre-Trends," Documentos CEDE 21199, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    7. Timothy J. Layton & Nicole Maestas & Daniel Prinz & Boris Vabson, 2019. "Private vs. Public Provision of Social Insurance: Evidence from Medicaid," NBER Working Papers 26042, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J15 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:255-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.