IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/yid420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The UK experience of research performance assessment: the RAE and its critics

Author

Listed:
  • M. A. Safonova

Abstract

Research Assessment Exercises (RAE), introduced in the UK by the Thatcher's government, are widely regarded as the prototype of all subsequent academic neoliberal reforms which took place in the university sector of European countries in 1980-2000s. Attaining greater research and financial efficiency of the academic sector was declared as the main goal of these reforms. Promotion of market-based instruments and emphasis on the open competition inside the university sector were basic policy principles which influenced the design of rAe. The study of RAE practices and consequences reported in this article has been conducted in the framework of a broader project, focusing on the systems of university management and their influence on academic careers. The basic data source of the study were (1) interviews with UK social scientists, who had significant experience of both academic and administrative work, and (2) official documents, produced in the course of RAE campaigns.

Suggested Citation

  • M. A. Safonova, 0. "The UK experience of research performance assessment: the RAE and its critics," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, issue 6.
  • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/420/421
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.