Author
Listed:
- A. A. Muraveva
- N. M. Aksenova
- N. Sh. Vatolkina
Abstract
Introduction. The article studies various aspects of the Bologna Process discourse from the perspective of its impact on the development of higher education in recent decades. Special attention is paid to the practices of Russian universities’ participation in European Tempus and Erasmus+ projects. The aim of the article is to provide evidence of the benefits of the Bologna Process as a factor, which promotes and ensures sustainable social development by means of higher education internationalization, enhancing the experts’ interaction on the issues of higher education. Materials and methods used include comparative analysis, empiric data collection, conceptual and terminological analysis, interpretation, modeling, and problem solving. Results. The article identifies the key system factors which ensure the positive dynamics of the Bologna Process. This is substantiated by the facts of its implementation in Russia within the Tempus and Erasmus+ Projects. It also shows the actors of this process’ awareness of a need to adapt its goals and methods to complicated and rapidly changing situations. Discussion and Conclusion. The article confirms the hypothesis of the importance of the Bologna Process for the development and modernization of higher education. The theories claiming that the Bologna Process is a neoliberal endeavour are proved unsubstantial. The results presented in the article can be used in pre-service and in-service programmes and courses for higher education teachers, administrators, and researchers.
Suggested Citation
A. A. Muraveva & N. M. Aksenova & N. Sh. Vatolkina, 2019.
"Bologna Process: Area For Development Or A Neoliberal Project?,"
University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 23(3).
Handle:
RePEc:adf:journl:y:2019:id:1044
DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.03.024
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2019:id:1044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.