IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/y2019id1035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Monitoring Of Monitoring: What’S Wrong With The Ministry’S New Approach To Supervision Of Effectiveness Of Higher Education Institutions’ Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • V. Bolotov
  • G. Motova
  • V. Navodnov

Abstract

The article discusses the Monitoring of higher education institutions’ (HEIs’) effectiveness, which has been conducted annually by the Ministry of Education and Science in the last five years. The method of the Monitoring is based on the technology of collecting and systematizing information used by the state accreditation in 1997–2010. The reasons for the introduction of the Monitoring by the Ministry are described; the features of the performance indicators are justified by the state educational policy. A model of presentation of the Monitoring results in the league table format is suggested, which makes it possible to use its results more flexibly for the management of the higher education system. It also allows higher education institutions to analyze their positions and to form their own ways of the development.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Bolotov & G. Motova & V. Navodnov, 2019. "The Monitoring Of Monitoring: What’S Wrong With The Ministry’S New Approach To Supervision Of Effectiveness Of Higher Education Institutions’ Performance?," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 23(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2019:id:1035
    DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.03.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1035/997
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/umpa.2019.03.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2019:id:1035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.