IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2018id936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Branding in Russia: Development Barriers

Author

Listed:
  • L. A. Filippova
  • A. S. Khvorostyanaya

Abstract

Goal. Given the modern aspects of building a strong brand, the strategic assets of companies are their trademarks, which, with good governance, act as revenue generators. Recently, the problems of implementing an investment project with minimal risks and high efficiency become more acute, as in the current market there are many limiting factors that negatively affect the successful development of the domestic brand. The purpose of the study in this article is to identify internal and external factors that limit development and reduce the competitiveness of domestic brands in the Russian market in modern conditions.Methods. In the study, using qualitative analysis of available statistics and examples, the main barriers to the presence of domestic brands are considered. The main methodology for building the development strategy of the company is proposed by the well-known economiststrategist, professor V. Kvint and has been tested in practice for 45 years.Results. As a result of this research, a comparative competitive analysis of brands in the world and in Russia was conducted, statistical data of a large analytical source on intellectual property of WIPO were analyzed, five main negative factors influencing the development of the national branding industry in Russia were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • L. A. Filippova & A. S. Khvorostyanaya, 2018. "Strategic Branding in Russia: Development Barriers," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 9.
    • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2018:id:936
    DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-167-176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/936/920
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-167-176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wernerfelt, Birger, 1990. "Advertising Content When Brand Choice Is a Signal," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(1), pages 91-98, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangeeta Devanathan, 2020. "Indian Consumers’ Assessment of ‘Luxuriousness’: A Comparison of Indian and Western Luxury Brands," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 84-95, January.
    2. Pedro M. Gardete & Liang Guo, 2021. "Prepurchase Information Acquisition and Credible Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1696-1717, March.
    3. Sara Alghanim & Nelson Oly Ndubisi, 2022. "The Paradox of Sustainability and Luxury Consumption: The Role of Value Perceptions and Consumer Income," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Pedro M. Gardete & Yakov Bart, 2018. "Tailored Cheap Talk: The Effects of Privacy Policy on Ad Content and Market Outcomes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 733-752, September.
    5. Florian H. Schneider, 2020. "Signaling ideology through consumption," ECON - Working Papers 367, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2022.
    6. Yue Yuan & Mary E. Deily & Yuliang Yao, 2022. "Willingness to Pay for Status Signals in Online Luxury Markets," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 668-680, February.
    7. Dixon, Darcie & Mikolon, Sven, 2021. "Cents of self: How and when self-signals influence consumer value derived from choices of green products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 365-386.
    8. Paloma Almodóvar & José Emilio Navas López & Patricia Huerta Riveros, 2009. "La tipología estratégica como factor determinante de la empresa conjunta internacional," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 33(3), pages 407-438, September.
    9. T. Tony Ke & Yuting Zhu, 2021. "Cheap Talk on Freelance Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5901-5920, September.
    10. Eric T. Anderson & Duncan I. Simester, 2001. "Price Discrimination as an Adverse Signal: Why an Offer to Spread Payments May Hurt Demand," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 315-327, November.
    11. Nick Vikander, 2011. "Targeted Advertising and Social Status," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-016/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Amir Heiman & Joel Ferguson & David Zilberman, 2020. "Marketing and Technology Adoption and Diffusion," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 21-30, March.
    13. Pedro M. Gardete, 2013. "Cheap-Talk Advertising and Misrepresentation in Vertically Differentiated Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 609-621, July.
    14. Dmitri Kuksov & Kangkang Wang, 2013. "A Model of the "It" Products in Fashion," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 51-69, July.
    15. Trespeuch Léo & Robinot Élisabeth, 2023. "Exploring the Impact of Corporate Philanthropy on Brand Authenticity in the Luxury Industry: Scale Development and Empirical Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Chun (Martin) Qiu & Demetrios Vakratsas & Filippo Dall’Olio, 2019. "Advertising Originality Decisions in Competition," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 6(1), pages 13-25, June.
    17. Siddharth Bhattacharya & Jing Gong & Sunil Wattal, 2022. "Competitive Poaching in Search Advertising: Two Randomized Field Experiments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 599-619, June.
    18. Hema Yoganarasimhan, 2012. "Cloak or Flaunt? The Fashion Dilemma," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 74-95, January.
    19. Dmitri Kuksov & Ron Shachar & Kangkang Wang, 2013. "Advertising and Consumers' Communications," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 294-309, March.
    20. Raluca Mihalcea & Iacob Cătoiu, 2008. "Consumer Identity And Implications For The Brand," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(10), pages 1-50.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2018:id:936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.