Excellence in Research for Australia: An Audit of the Applied Economics Rankings
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Robert A. Buckle and John Creedy, 2018.
"The Impact on Research Quality of Performance-Based Funding: The Case of New Zealand’s PBRF Scheme,"
Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 25-48.
- Buckle, Robert A & Creedy, John, 2018. "The Impact on Research Quality of Performance-Based Funding: The Case of New Zealand's PBRF Scheme," Working Paper Series 20830, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
- Anita Doraisami & Alex Millmow, 2016. "Funding Australian economics research: Local benefits?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(4), pages 511-524, December.
- John Lodewijks & Tony Stokes, 2014. "Is Academic Economics Withering in Australia?," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 69-90.
- Lodewijks, John & Stokes, Anthony & Wright, Sarah, 2016. "Economics: An elite subject soon only available in elite universities?," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 1-9.
- Robert A. Buckle and John Creedy, 2018.
"The Impact on Research Quality of Performance-Based Funding: The Case of New Zealand’s PBRF Scheme,"
Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 25-48.
- Buckle, Robert A. & Creedy, John, 2018. "The Impact on Research Quality of Performance-Based Funding: The Case of New Zealand's PBRF Scheme," Working Paper Series 7613, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
- Chris Berg, 2015. "Classical Liberalism in Australian Economics," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 12(2), pages 192–220-1, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acb:agenda:v:20:y:2013:i:2:p:5-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feanuau.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.