IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abk/jajeba/ajebasp.2011.157.164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Technique for Quality Evaluation of E-Learning from Developers Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Majdi Abdellatief
  • Abu Bakar Md Sultan
  • Marzanah A. Jabar
  • Rusli Abdullah

Abstract

Problem statement: E-learning is gaining more acceptance as days pass because it provides learning opportunity any time and in any place. Different people have different preferences in terms of learning style such as reading text, listing audio or video, speaking and communication. To support these different learning preferences, there is need for multiple e-learning delivery methods and teaching techniques. Furthermore, there are many stakeholders of e-learning systems such as system developers, administrators, instructors, instructional designers, multimedia designers, online facilitators, independent evaluators. Whose views are important indicators for a complete e-learning system evaluation, but the most important views of e-learning quality are user view, developer’s view and manger’s view. Approach: The main aim of this study is to propose a new technique to evaluate e-learning website quality from developer’s view. To achieve our objective an extensive study on related resources was conducted. Our technique adopts the weights of quality characteristics which are obtained by carefully selected questionnaires’ from professional developers. We also present the evaluation process using AHP technique and the result of trial evaluation for validation of our technique Result: We proposed four quality characteristics named Service Content, System Functionality, Information Technology and System Reliability. We further, proposed 11 sub-characteristics with its attributes by following the structure of standard IOS/IEC 912. Conclusion: Our results show that the proposed technique could be useful and effective for ensuring that high quality systems are developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Majdi Abdellatief & Abu Bakar Md Sultan & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rusli Abdullah, 2011. "A Technique for Quality Evaluation of E-Learning from Developers Perspective," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 157-164, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2011.157.164
    DOI: 10.3844/ajebasp.2011.157.164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/pdf/ajebasp.2011.157.164.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/abstract/ajebasp.2011.157.164
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.157.164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikolić, Vlastimir & Kaljevic, Jelena & Jović, Srđan & Petković, Dalibor & Milovančević, Miloš & Dimitrov, Ljubomir & Dachkinov, Pancho, 2018. "Survey of quality models of e-learning systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 511(C), pages 324-330.
    2. Wan Hussain Wan Ishak, 2011. "A Review Note of KMICe 2010: Knowledge Management Initiatives to Improve Organization Performance," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 219-223, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2011.157.164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jeffery Daniels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thescipub.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.