IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v28y2024i41647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional Research versus Advanced Algorithms: “Is Survey in the Last Days?

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelo Luiz Dias da Silva Gabriel
  • Jose Afonso Mazzon
  • Giuliana Isabella
  • Ricardo Limongi França Coelho
  • Evandro Luiz Lopes
  • Vinicius Andrade Brei

Abstract

Objective: to examine the contemporary challenges faced by the survey method in the administration field, particularly in marketing, due to the emergence of new technologies and changes in respondent behavior. Provocations: with the rise of artificial intelligence, the traditional survey method is increasingly being questioned. Issues such as response validity, respondent fatigue, and proliferation of behavioral data obtained through automated means cast doubt on the survey’s effectiveness in capturing actual consumer behavior. Additionally, new legislation may introduce restrictions that could impact data collection via surveys. Conclusions: although not obsolete, the survey method must reinvent itself to remain relevant. Integrating new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, and combining them with qualitative methods are suggested paths to improve research effectiveness in an environment heavily influenced by technological advancements. The future of the survey depends on its ability to adapt and complement other emerging approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelo Luiz Dias da Silva Gabriel & Jose Afonso Mazzon & Giuliana Isabella & Ricardo Limongi França Coelho & Evandro Luiz Lopes & Vinicius Andrade Brei, 2024. "Traditional Research versus Advanced Algorithms: “Is Survey in the Last Days?," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 28(Vol. 28 N), pages 240246-2402.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:28:y:2024:i:4:1647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1647
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1647/2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:28:y:2024:i:4:1647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.