IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v26y2022i31510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty of Claims Provisions from the Analysis of Financial Statements

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Bomgiovani Cazzari
  • Guilherme Rodovalho Fernandes Moreira

Abstract

Objective: considering the current level of transparency in the financial statements of Brazilian insurers, this study sought to assess whether it was possible to estimate the sufficiency of the claims reserves estimated by it. As they are liabilities with an uncertain term or amount, the estimates of these reserves may be underestimated (compromising the insurers) or overestimated (burdening the shareholders), which justifies the research question. Methods: after analyzing the financial statements of 31 insurance companies in Brazil, it was noted that the criteria for disclosing claims development varied substantially. Thus, five insurers were selected that adopted similar procedures and allowed the application of the bootstrapping model to estimate the sufficiency level of the provisions. Results: the application of the model revealed that there are indications that insurers can make use of earnings management through the estimations of the claims reserves, spreading the burden of claims insufficiency risk differently between policyholders and shareholders. Conclusion: there are differences in the relative amount of claims recognized by the insurers, showing a possible earnings management practice being applied through the claims measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Bomgiovani Cazzari & Guilherme Rodovalho Fernandes Moreira, 2022. "Uncertainty of Claims Provisions from the Analysis of Financial Statements," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(3), pages 200400-2004.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:26:y:2022:i:3:1510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1510
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1510/1736
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackson, Richard H.G. & Wood, Anthony, 2013. "The performance of insolvency prediction and credit risk models in the UK: A comparative study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 183-202.
    2. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J., 2002. "Stochastic Claims Reserving in General Insurance," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 443-518, August.
    3. England, Peter & Verrall, Richard, 1999. "Analytic and bootstrap estimates of prediction errors in claims reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 281-293, December.
    4. Ioannis Badounas & Georgios Pitselis, 2020. "Loss Reserving Estimation With Correlated Run-Off Triangles in a Quantile Longitudinal Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Thomas R. Berry-Stölzle & Evan M. Eastman & Jianren Xu, 2018. "CEO Overconfidence and Earnings Management: Evidence from Property-Liability Insurers' Loss Reserves," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 380-404, July.
    6. Wen‐Yen Hsu & Yenyu (Rebecca) Huang & Gene Lai, 2019. "Reserve Management and Audit Committee Characteristics: Evidence from U.S. Property–Liability Insurance Companies," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 86(4), pages 1019-1043, December.
    7. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Niemeyer, Andreas, 2014. "Fundamental Definition Of The Solvency Capital Requirement In Solvency Ii," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 501-533, September.
    8. Eduardo Ramos-P'erez & Pablo J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & Jos'e Javier N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Stochastic reserving with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2008.07564, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gian Paolo Clemente & Nino Savelli & Diego Zappa, 2019. "Modelling Outstanding Claims with Mixed Compound Processes in Insurance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 123-138, March.
    2. Pitselis, Georgios & Grigoriadou, Vasiliki & Badounas, Ioannis, 2015. "Robust loss reserving in a log-linear model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 14-27.
    3. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen, 2018. "Generalized Log-Normal Chain-Ladder," Papers 1806.05939, arXiv.org.
    4. Eduardo Ramos-P'erez & Pablo J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & Jos'e Javier N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Stochastic reserving with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2008.07564, arXiv.org.
    5. Liivika Tee & Meelis Käärik & Rauno Viin, 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Mat'uv{s} Maciak & Ostap Okhrin & Michal Pev{s}ta, 2019. "Infinitely Stochastic Micro Forecasting," Papers 1908.10636, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    7. Gareth W. Peters & Mario V. Wuthrich & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2010. "Chain ladder method: Bayesian bootstrap versus classical bootstrap," Papers 1004.2548, arXiv.org.
    8. Boj del Val, Eva & Costa Cor, Teresa, 2017. "Provisions for claims outstanding, incurred but not reported, with generalized linear models: prediction error formulated according to calendar year," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    9. Verrall, R.J. & England, P.D., 2005. "Incorporating expert opinion into a stochastic model for the chain-ladder technique," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 355-370, October.
    10. László Martinek, 2019. "Analysis of Stochastic Reserving Models By Means of NAIC Claims Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, June.
    11. Taylor, Greg, 2021. "A special Tweedie sub-family with application to loss reserving prediction error," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 262-288.
    12. Peters, Gareth W. & Wüthrich, Mario V. & Shevchenko, Pavel V., 2010. "Chain ladder method: Bayesian bootstrap versus classical bootstrap," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 36-51, August.
    13. Kunkler, Michael, 2006. "Modelling negatives in stochastic reserving models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 540-555, June.
    14. Maciak, Matúš & Okhrin, Ostap & Pešta, Michal, 2021. "Infinitely stochastic micro reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 30-58.
    15. Jonas Harnau, 2018. "Log-Normal or Over-Dispersed Poisson?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-37, July.
    16. Karthik Sriram & Peng Shi, 2021. "Stochastic loss reserving: A new perspective from a Dirichlet model," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(1), pages 195-230, March.
    17. Margraf, Carolin & Elpidorou, Valandis & Verrall, Richard, 2018. "Claims reserving in the presence of excess-of-loss reinsurance using micro models based on aggregate data," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 54-65.
    18. Jonas Harnau, 2018. "Misspecification Tests for Log-Normal and Over-Dispersed Poisson Chain-Ladder Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, March.
    19. Han, Zhongxian & Gau, Wu-Chyuan, 2008. "Estimation of loss reserves with lognormal development factors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 389-395, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:26:y:2022:i:3:1510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.