IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v26y2022i11494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Dependence on Brazilian Third-Party Logistics Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Carlos Rodrigues
  • Ricardo Silveira Martins

Abstract

Context: studies argue that similar levels of dependence are essential for supplier satisfaction in buyer-supplier relationships. However, asymmetric relationships can also lead to supplier satisfaction. Objective: this paper investigates the effects of benefit-based dependence (positive motivations for maintaining relationships) between buyer and supplier and supplier satisfaction. Methods: response surface analysis (RSA) was used to test the relationship between third-party logistics (3PL) dependence and satisfaction dimensions in 174 dyads. Results: the results demonstrated that about supplier satisfaction, instead of dependence asymmetry what really matters is the degree of dependence between the parties. The more dependent one part is on the other, usually, the greater the supplier’s satisfaction. In many circumstances, a degree of dependence is acceptable and necessary to access resources and opportunities. Conclusions: the interaction between buyer and supplier dependence and supplier satisfaction is complex. Situations of dependence asymmetry in which the supplier is highly dependent on the buyer may still be satisfactory.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Carlos Rodrigues & Ricardo Silveira Martins, 2022. "The Effects of Dependence on Brazilian Third-Party Logistics Satisfaction," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(1), pages 200380-2003.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:26:y:2022:i:1:1494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1494
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1494/1690
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felix Reimann & David J. Ketchen Jr., 2017. "Power in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 3-9, April.
    2. Baofeng Huo & Qiang Wang & Xiande Zhao & Sebastian Schuh, 2016. "Threats and benefits of power discrepancies between organisations: a supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(13), pages 3870-3884, July.
    3. Baofeng Huo & Barbara B. Flynn & Xiande Zhao, 2017. "Supply Chain Power Configurations and Their Relationship with Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 88-111, April.
    4. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    5. Renata P. Brito & Priscila L. S. Miguel, 2017. "Power, Governance, and Value in Collaboration: Differences between Buyer and Supplier Perspectives," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 61-87, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    2. Janosch Brinker & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2022. "Power in the Context of SCM and Supply Chain Digitalization: An Overview from a Literature Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Else, Tim & Choudhary, Sonal & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "Uncovering sustainability storylines from dairy supply chain discourse," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 858-874.
    4. Anne M. Quarshie & Rudolf Leuschner, 2020. "Interorganizational Interaction in Disaster Response Networks: A Government Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(3), pages 3-25, July.
    5. Gu, Jing & Shi, Xinyu & Wang, Junyao & Xu, Xun, 2024. "Examining the impact of market power discrepancy between supply chain partners on firm financial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    6. Christian Hofer & Jordan M. Barker & Laura D'Oria & Jonathan L. Johnson, 2022. "Broadening our understanding of interfirm rivalry: A call for research on how supply networks shape competitive behavior and performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 8-25, April.
    7. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    8. Antonio Carlos Rodrigues, 2021. "Response Surface Analysis: A Tutorial for Examining Linear and Curvilinear Effects," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(6), pages 200293-2002.
    9. Vos, F.G.S. & Van der Lelij, R. & Schiele, H. & Praas, N.H.J., 2021. "Mediating the impact of power on supplier satisfaction: Do buyer status and relational conflict matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    10. Roger Strange & John Humphrey, 2019. "What lies between market and hierarchy? Insights from internalization theory and global value chain theory," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1401-1413, October.
    11. Benjamin Lawrence & Jie J. Zhang & Liwu Hsu & Sarah Zheng, 2021. "Return on Investments in Hotel Franchising: Understanding Moderating Effects of Franchisee Dependence," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2420-2440, August.
    12. Felix Reimann & David J. Ketchen Jr., 2017. "Power in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 3-9, April.
    13. Munten, Pauline & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Maon, François & Swaen, Valérie & Lindgreen, Adam, 2021. "Addressing tensions in coopetition for sustainable innovation: Insights from the automotive industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 10-20.
    14. Michael J. Mol & Sun Hye Lee, 2024. "What produces corporate social irresponsibility in offshore outsourcing? The effects of interorganizational relationship governance and institutional distance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(5), pages 577-592, July.
    15. Dahlberg, Tomi & Öörni, Anssi, 2006. "Finnish consumers' expectations on developments and changes in payment habits: survey in connection with the research project "Finnish payment habits 2010"," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 32/2006, Bank of Finland.
    16. Mahdi Omidi & Qingfei Min & Ali Omidi, 2017. "Multi-level analysis framework for reviewing IDT-based studies," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1339338-133, January.
    17. Aziz Barhmi & Omar Hajaji, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Resilience: Conceptualization and Scale Development," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 43-69.
    18. Moghavvemi, Sedigheh & Mei, Tan Xin & Phoong, Seuk Wai & Phoong, Seuk Yen, 2021. "Drivers and barriers of mobile payment adoption: Malaysian merchants' perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani & Robert Paul Jones & Kerri M. Camp, 2019. "Levels of EMR Adoption in U.S. Hospitals: An Empirical Examination of Absorptive Capacity, Institutional Pressures, Top Management Beliefs, and Participation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1325-1344, December.
    20. Elbanna, Amany & Newman, Mike, 2022. "The bright side and the dark side of top management support in Digital Transformaion –A hermeneutical reading," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:26:y:2022:i:1:1494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.