IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abf/journl/v30y2020i2p23309-23313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Transgastric Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Gallbladder-Preserving Surgery Compared with Traditional Operation and its Clinical Application

Author

Listed:
  • Xian-bin Zhou
  • Li-ping Ye
  • Xin-li Mao
  • Jian-fen Wu
  • Cai yue
  • Bin-bin Gu
  • Yu-Zhang
  • Jin-bang Peng
  • Shao-wei Li

    (Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, LinHai, Zhejiang, China)

  • Min Quan

    (Reproductive & Women-Children Hospital, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China)

  • Kuai Ma

    (Division of Transplantation Immunology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Shi-wen Xu

    (Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China)

  • Li Wang

    (College of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the incidence rate of gallstones has been increasing under the multiple influences of environment...

Suggested Citation

  • Xian-bin Zhou & Li-ping Ye & Xin-li Mao & Jian-fen Wu & Cai yue & Bin-bin Gu & Yu-Zhang & Jin-bang Peng & Shao-wei Li & Min Quan & Kuai Ma & Shi-wen Xu & Li Wang, 2020. "The Advantages and Disadvantages of Transgastric Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Gallbladder-Preserving Surgery Compared with Traditional Operation and its Clinical Application," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 30(2), pages 23309-23313, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:30:y:2020:i:2:p:23309-23313
    DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.30.004936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.004936.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.004936.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26717/BJSTR.2020.30.004936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanqiong Liu & Yu He & Taijie Li & Li Xie & Jian Wang & Xue Qin & Shan Li, 2014. "Risk of Primary Liver Cancer Associated with Gallstones and Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-9, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:30:y:2020:i:2:p:23309-23313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Roy (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.