IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abf/journl/v20y2019i3p14966-14969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Technology Assessments - Evidence Based Approach for A Sustainable Future of Healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Manish Barman

    (Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Qatar)

  • Narendra Kumar

    (Department of Cardiology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK)

  • Barman Palak

    (Vancouver School of Economics, Canada)

Abstract

Health Technology Assessments (HTA) are being increasingly used as an approach to guide and advise both pioneers and strategy creators for arrangement and delivery of medical services. This has been an after-effect of affirmation that resources are restricted, and consequently technologies need appraisals on standards past scientific favorability alone...

Suggested Citation

  • Manish Barman & Narendra Kumar & Barman Palak, 2019. "Health Technology Assessments - Evidence Based Approach for A Sustainable Future of Healthcare," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 20(3), pages 14966-14969, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:14966-14969
    DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.20.003440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.003440.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.003440.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26717/BJSTR.2019.20.003440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cairns, John, 2006. "Providing guidance to the NHS: The Scottish Medicines Consortium and the National Institute for Clinical Excellence compared," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 134-143, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, Michael & Drummond, Michael & Taylor, David & McGuire, Alistair & Carter, Paul & Mossialos, Elias, 2022. "Promoting innovation while controlling cost: The UK's approach to health technology assessment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 224-233.
    2. Michael Drummond & Bengt Jönsson & Frans Rutten & Tom Stargardt, 2011. "Reimbursement of pharmaceuticals: reference pricing versus health technology assessment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(3), pages 263-271, June.
    3. Karimi, M. & Brazier, J. & Paisley, S., 2017. "How do individuals value health states? A qualitative investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 80-88.
    4. Fischer, Katharina E. & Leidl, Reiner & Rogowski, Wolf H., 2011. "A structured tool to analyse coverage decisions: Development and feasibility test in the field of cancer screening and prevention," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 290-299, August.
    5. Michael A. Kozminski & Peter J. Neumann & Eric S. Nadler & Aleksandra Jankovic & Peter A. Ubel, 2011. "How Long and How Well," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(3), pages 380-385, May.
    6. Fischer, Katharina Elisabeth & Heisser, Thomas & Stargardt, Tom, 2016. "Health benefit assessment of pharmaceuticals: An international comparison of decisions from Germany, England, Scotland and Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1115-1122.
    7. Nicod, Elena & Kanavos, Panos, 2012. "Commonalities and differences in HTA outcomes: A comparative analysis of five countries and implications for coverage decisions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 167-177.
    8. Morris, Zoë Slote & Clarkson, Peter John, 2009. "Does social marketing provide a framework for changing healthcare practice?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 135-141, July.
    9. Csanádi, Marcell & Ozierański, Piotr & Löblová, Olga & King, Lawrence & Kaló, Zoltán & Botz, Lajos, 2019. "Shedding light on the HTA consultancy market: Insights from Poland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1237-1243.
    10. Carroll, Christopher & Kaltenthaler, Eva & FitzGerald, Patrick & Boland, Angela & Dickson, Rumona, 2011. "A thematic analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of manufacturers’ submissions to the NICE Single Technology Assessment (STA) process," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 136-144.
    11. Michael Drummond & Gerard Pouvourville & Elizabeth Jones & Jennifer Haig & Grece Saba & Hélène Cawston, 2014. "A Comparative Analysis of Two Contrasting European Approaches for Rewarding the Value Added by Drugs for Cancer: England Versus France," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 509-520, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abf:journl:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:14966-14969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Roy (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.