IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v34y2021i2no12p163-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

It is the Time to Depart from the Mirror Game in the Rhetoric of Economics لقدْ آنَ الأوانُ للتَّخلُّصِ من لُعبةِ المرآةِ في الخطابة عن علمِ الاقتصاد

Author

Listed:
  • Abderrazak Belabes

    (Professor, Islamic Economics Institute King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The discourse on the economic system of Islam was constructed from the late 1940s onwards as a mirror game in relation to the capitalist and socialist systems. In recent decades, the discourse has positioned itself in relation to the neoclassical model under the reign of the market system in a context where all aspects of human life are subordinated to the power of finance. Despite the change of referent, this discourse remains trapped in the ‘mirror game’, i.e., the fact of constructing an argument by appealing to fictitious facts or truncated realities. This article draws attention to the need to free oneself from this mirror game which puts the discourse on Islamic economics in a vicious circle. Yet, the Muslim heritage of knowledge abounds in priceless conceptual treasures. This is evidenced by the notion of ‘Ma’āsh’ as developed by al-Khalīl al-Farāhīdī (718-786), which refers to a double meaning: ‘what allows to live with’ and ‘what allows to live inside’. Such an approach encompasses the material aspects of life and the interactions between humans and their living environments. It has the merit of opening a new field of meditation worthy of interest in comparison with the writings of Ibn Khaldun and Polanyi. بُنِيَ الخطابُ عن النِّظام الاقتصاديّ للإسلام بعْدَ أواخرِ أربعينات القرن العشرين الميلاديّ في شكل لُعْبة مِرْآة بين النِّظامين الرّأسماليِّ والاشتراكيِّ. في العقُود الأخيرة، أُعيدَت صياغةُ الخطابِ بالنَّظر إلى النَّموذج النِّيو الكلاسيكيِّ في ظلِّ سيادةِ نظامِ السُّوق وخُضوعِ كافَّة جوانبِ الحياةِ البَشريَّة لِسُلطة التَّمْويلِ. على الرَّغم منْ تغْيِير المسْتَند المعرفيِّ، يظلّ هذا الخطاب عالقًا في "لعبة المرآة" التي تتمثَّل في بناءِ حجَّة من خلال اللُّجوء إلى وقائع وهميَّة أو حقائق مبتورة بشكلٍ انتقائيٍّ. تُلفت المقالة الانتباه إلى ضرورة التَّحرر من رِبْقَة لعبة المرآة التي وضعتْ الخطابَ عن الاقتصادِ الإسلاميِّ في حلْقةٍ مُفرَغةٍ، رغم أنَّ التُّراث الإسلاميِّ للمعرفة يَزْخر بكنوز مفاهيميَّة لا تُقدَّر بثمنٍ، منها: مفهومُ "المعاشِ" وفقًا للمعنى المزْدوَجِ الذي أشار إليه الخليلُ الفراهيدي (718-786م)، وهو: "ما يُعاشُ به" و "ما يُعاشُ فيه". هذه المقاربة تشملُ الجوانب الماديَّة للحياة، كما تتضمَّن التَّفاعلات بين البشر وبيئاتِ المعاشِ؛ ممَّا يفتحُ مجالاً جديدًا للتَّأمُّلِ يستحقُّ الاهتمام مقارنةً بما أشار إليه ابن خلدون وبولانيي بخصوص مفهومِ المعاشِ.

Suggested Citation

  • Abderrazak Belabes, 2021. "It is the Time to Depart from the Mirror Game in the Rhetoric of Economics لقدْ آنَ الأوانُ للتَّخلُّصِ من لُعبةِ المرآةِ في الخطابة عن علمِ الاقتصاد," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 34(2), pages 163-171, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:34:y:2021:i:2:no:12:p:163-171
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.34-2.12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153866_34-02-12-DF-Abelabes-080721.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.34-2.12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asad Zaman, 2021. "Islamic Alternatives to the Secular Morality Embedded in Modern Economics البدائل الإسلامية للأخلاقيات العلمانية المُتضمنة في الاقتصاد الحديث," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 34(2), pages 83-100, July.
    2. Donald McCloskey, 1994. "How economists persuade," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 15-32.
    3. Dow, Sheila, 2002. "Economic Methodology: An Inquiry," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198776123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendy Olsen & University of Manchester, 2005. "Pluralism, Poverty and Sharecropping: Cultivating Open-Mindedness in Development Studies," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-008, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. John Hart, 2009. "Machlup's misrepresentation of Hutchison's methodology," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 325-340.
    3. Thomas Mayer, 2001. "The role of ideology in disagreements among economists: a quantitative analysis," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 253-273.
    4. Martha A. Starr, 2014. "Qualitative And Mixed-Methods Research In Economics: Surprising Growth, Promising Future," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 238-264, April.
    5. Stavros Drakopoulos & Ioannis Katselidis, 2015. "From Edgeworth to econophysics: a methodological perspective," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 77-95, March.
    6. Ricardo F. Crespo, 2012. "Models as signs" as "good economic models," Estudios Economicos, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Departamento de Economia, vol. 29(58), pages 1-12, january-j.
    7. Teodoro Dario Togati, 2012. "The crisis in macro and the limitations of the economics of Keynes – or why the master will not return unless his General Theory is dressed up in neo-modern clothes," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Keynes’s General Theory for Today, chapter 3, pages 40-59, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Lucey, Brian M. & Delaney, Liam, 2007. "A psychological, attitudinal and professional profile of Irish economists," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 841-855, December.
    9. Annina Kaltenbrunner, 2018. "Financialised internationalisation and structural hierarchies: a mixed-method study of exchange rate determination in emerging economies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(5), pages 1315-1341.
    10. Marangos, John, 2009. "What happened to the Washington Consensus? The evolution of international development policy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 197-208, January.
    11. Abdelrahman Yousri Abdelrahman, 2021. "Status and Trends of Research in Islamic Economics: Questions, Answers and Comments حالة وتوجهات البحث في الاقتصاد الإسلامي: أسئلة وأجوبة وتعليقات," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 34(2), pages 101-110, July.
    12. Wendy Olsen & University of Manchester, 2006. "Pluralist Methodology for Development Economics: The Example of Moral Economy of Indian Labour Markets," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-053, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    13. Yefimov, Vladimir, 2011. "Дискурсивный Анализ В Экономике:Пересмотр Методологии И Истории Экономической Науки. Часть 1. Иная Методология Экономической Науки [Discourse analysis in economics: methodology and history of econo," MPRA Paper 49157, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Giuseppe Fontana & Bill Gerrard, 2006. "The future of Post Keynesian economics," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 59(236), pages 49-80.
    15. Robert Sproule & C?lin Vâlsan, 2009. "The student evaluation of teaching: its failure as a research program, and as an administrative guide," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(25), pages 125-150, February.
    16. Stavros Drakopoulos & Ioannis Katselidis, 2014. "The Development of Trade Union Theory and Mainstream Economic Methodology," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 1133-1149, December.
    17. Rouven Reinke, 2021. "A critical note on the scientific conception of economics: claiming for a methodological pluralism," Post-Print hal-03374887, HAL.
    18. Marko Lah & Andrej Sušjan, 2024. "A Heterodox Approach to Masstige: Brand Fetishism, Corporate Pricing, and Rules of Consumer Choice," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 214-232, June.
    19. Frank Stilwell, 2019. "From Economics to Political Economy: Contradictions, Challenge, and Change," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 35-62, January.
    20. Stavros A. Drakopoulos, 2020. "Pay Level Comparisons in Job Satisfaction Research and Mainstream Economic Methodology," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 825-842, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic discourse; Mirror game; Methodology; Livelihood. الخطابُ الاقتصاديُّ، لعبةُ المرآةِ، المنهجيَّة، المعاشُ.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
    • B59 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:34:y:2021:i:2:no:12:p:163-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.