IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v31y2018i1no1p3-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Deprivation from Maqasid al-Shariah Dimensions in OIC Countries: Ranking and Policy Focus قياس الحرمان من خلال أبعاد مقاصد الشريعة في دول منظمة التعاون الإسلامي: الترتيب ونقاط التركيز السياسية

Author

Listed:
  • Salman Syed Ali

    (Senior Economist, Islamic Research and Training Institute, Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hamid Hasan

    (Assistant Professor, International Institute of Islamic Economics, International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan)

Abstract

While economists have established the link between values and economy, it has been ignored in popular measures of socio-economic development. The paper proposes a complementary values-based index to existing value-neutral indices on socio-economic development and formulates a 3-stage policy to reduce deprivation from maqasid al-Shariah (the objectives of Islamic law) dimensions in OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) countries by setting up absolute and relative policy targets. It explores the policy focus for maqasid al-Shariah (MS) dimensions by ranking OIC countries using recent World Values Survey (WVS wave 6). The paper contributes by extending the frontiers of knowledge in multiple ways. It is the first to propose the use of an MS index from a policy perspective. It outlines selection criteria for choosing indicators within Shariah perspective. It constructs a Maqasid al-Shariah Deprivation Perception Index (MSDPI), using the Alkire-Foster dual-cut-off counting methodology, which is easily replicable using data from a single publicly available authentic source. The results show not only the ranking of countries but also points out the dimensions in which improvements are required for comprehensive development by setting absolute and relative targets for policy intervention. في الوقت الذي أقر الاقتصاديون بوجود صلة بين القيم والاقتصاد، فقد تم تجاهل هذا الأمر في المقاييس السائدة للتنمية الاقتصادية والاجتماعية. تقترح هذه الورقة مؤشرًا مكملاً يستند إلى القيم كبديل لمؤشرات التنمية الاقتصادية والاجتماعية الموجودة (الخالية من القيم)، فضلاً عن صياغة سياسة اقتصادية ذات ثلاث مراحل لدول منظمة المؤتمر الإسلامي (OIC) للحد من القصور المترتب عن استبعاد مقاصد الشريعة الإسلامية من خلال أهداف مطلقة ونسبية للسياسات الاقتصادية. وفي هذا السياق، تستكشف الورقة محل اهتمام السياسات الاقتصادية بمقاصد الشريعة الإسلامية، حيث جرى ترتيب دول منظمة التعاون الإسلامي (OIC) وفق مسح القيم العالمية (World Values Survey) الحالي (WVS wave 6). وبذلك تساهم هذه الورقة في توسيع حدود المعرفة بطرق متعددة: فهي تقترح ابتداءً استخدام مؤشر لمقاصد الشريعة الإسلامية من منظور السياسات الاقتصادية وتحدد معايير اختيار هذا المؤشر، وانتهاءً ببناء مؤشر لقياس أثر استبعاد مقاصد الشريعة الإسلامية اعتمادًا على منهجية dual-cut off counting لـ Alkire-Foster. ومن ميزات هذا المؤشر أنه يمكن تكراره وتطبيقه على الدول المختلفة بسهولة باستخدام بيانات من مصدر واحد موثق متاح للجميع. ولم تظهر النتائج التي تم التوصل إليها ترتيب البلاد فحسب، وإنما أشارت كذلك إلى المجالات التي ينبغي إدخال تحسينات عليها بوضع أهداف مطلقة ونسبية عبر تدخلات السياسات الاقتصادية وصولاً لتحقيق التنمية الشاملة.

Suggested Citation

  • Salman Syed Ali & Hamid Hasan, 2018. "Measuring Deprivation from Maqasid al-Shariah Dimensions in OIC Countries: Ranking and Policy Focus قياس الحرمان من خلال أبعاد مقاصد الشريعة في دول منظمة التعاون الإسلامي: الترتيب ونقاط التركيز السياس," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 31(1), pages 3-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:31:y:2018:i:1:no:1:p:3-26
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.31-1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153869_31-01-01-Hamid-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.31-1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCleary, Rachel & Barro, Robert, 2003. "Religion and Economic Growth across Countries," Scholarly Articles 3708464, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    2. Rehman Scheherazade S. & Askari Hossein, 2010. "How Islamic are Islamic Countries?," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-40, May.
    3. Robert J. Barro & Rachel McCleary, 2003. "Religion and Economic Growth," NBER Working Papers 9682, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Alkire, Sabina & Foster, James, 2011. "Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7-8), pages 476-487, August.
    5. World Bank, 2017. "Monitoring Global Poverty," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 25141.
    6. Chapra, Mohammad Umar, 2008. "The Islamic Vision of Development in the Light of the Maqasid Al-Shari'ah (Research Paper)," Occasional Papers 235, The Islamic Research and Teaching Institute (IRTI).
    7. Humayon A. Dar, 2004. "On making human development more humane," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 31(11/12), pages 1071-1088, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salman Syed Ali & Hamid Hasan, 2019. "Does Religiosity Affect Multidimensional Poverty? Evidence from World Values Survey (2010-2014) هل يؤثر التدين على الفقر متعدد الأبعاد؟ أدلة من المسح العالمي للقيم (2014-2010م)," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 3-24, January.
    2. Arman Mergaliyev & Mehmet Asutay & Alija Avdukic & Yusuf Karbhari, 2021. "Higher Ethical Objective (Maqasid al-Shari’ah) Augmented Framework for Islamic Banks: Assessing Ethical Performance and Exploring Its Determinants," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 797-834, May.
    3. Burhanuddin Yusuf & Ali Rama, 2019. "Construction of Islamic Human Development Index بناء مؤشر التنمية البشرية الإسلامية," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(1), pages 43-64, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:abd:kauiea:v:31:y:2018:i:1:p:3-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Syed Ali, Salman & Hasan, Hamid, 2018. "Does Religiosity Affect Multidimensional Poverty? Evidence from World Values Survey (2010-14)," Working Papers 2018-6, The Islamic Research and Teaching Institute (IRTI).
    3. Syed Ali, Salman & Hasan, Hamid, 2014. "Towards a Maqasid al-Shariah based Development Index," Working Papers 1435-18, The Islamic Research and Teaching Institute (IRTI).
    4. Salman Syed Ali & Hamid Hasan, 2019. "Does Religiosity Affect Multidimensional Poverty? Evidence from World Values Survey (2010-2014) هل يؤثر التدين على الفقر متعدد الأبعاد؟ أدلة من المسح العالمي للقيم (2014-2010م)," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 3-24, January.
    5. Tan, Jonathan H.W. & Vogel, Claudia, 2008. "Religion and trust: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 832-848, December.
    6. Mariya Aleksynska & Barry Chiswick, 2013. "The determinants of religiosity among immigrants and the native born in Europe," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 563-598, December.
    7. Tiago Neves Sequeira & Marcelo Santos, 2019. "Technology in 1500 and genetic diversity," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1145-1165, April.
    8. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Cultural Gravity Effects among Migrants: A Comparative Analysis of the EU15," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(3), pages 343-380, July.
    9. Djankov, Simeon & Nikolova, Elena & Zilinsky, Jan, 2016. "The happiness gap in Eastern Europe," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 108-124.
    10. Steven N. Durlauf & Andros Kourtellos & Chih Ming Tan, 2012. "Is God in the details? A reexamination of the role of religion in economic growth," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(7), pages 1059-1075, November.
    11. Tausch, Arno, 2018. "The return of religious Antisemitism? The evidence from World Values Survey data," MPRA Paper 90093, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Daniel J. Benjamin & James J. Choi & Geoffrey Fisher, 2016. "Religious Identity and Economic Behavior," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(4), pages 617-637, October.
    13. Fischer, Justina AV & Schneider, Friedrich, 2007. "Protestantism and Government Spending: a Negative Relationship? An Empirical Application to Swiss Cantons," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 685, Stockholm School of Economics.
    14. Lo Turco, Alessia & Maggioni, Daniela, 2018. "Effects of Islamic religiosity on bilateral trust in trade: The case of Turkish exports," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 947-965.
    15. Dalgaard, Carl-Johan & Strulik, Holger, 2013. "The history augmented Solow model," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 134-149.
    16. Thomas Barnebeck Andersen & Jeanet Bentzen & Carl‐Johan Dalgaard & Paul Sharp, 2017. "Pre‐reformation Roots of the Protestant Ethic," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(604), pages 1756-1793, September.
    17. I. Hakan Yetkiner, 2006. "Saglik ile Buyume," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 83-91.
    18. Seth W. Norton & Annette Tomal, 2009. "Religion and Female Educational Attainment," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(5), pages 961-986, August.
    19. Grace Wyshak, 2016. "Income and Subjective Well-Being: New Insights from Relatively Healthy American Women, Ages 49-79," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Brian Piper, 2014. "Factor-Specific Productivity," Working Papers 1401, Sam Houston State University, Department of Economics and International Business.
    21. Raphael Corbi & Fabio Miessi Sanches, 2022. "Church Competition, Religious Subsidies and the Rise of Evangelicalism: a Dynamic Structural Analysis," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2022_09, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Maqasid al-Shariah; Multidimensional Poverty; Welfare; Policy. مقاصد الشريعة، الفقر متعدد الأبعاد، الرفاه، السياسة.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:31:y:2018:i:1:no:1:p:3-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.