IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aan/journl/v3y2021i2p96-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Major Central Bank’s Monetary Policy in Response to the Pandemic Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Gergana Ilieva Mihaylova-Borisova

    (Department of Finance, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to investigate the policy, performed by the main central banks during the crisis, related to spread of the COVID-19 crisis all over the world. The Central bank’s policy was one of the key policies for the countries to counter the negative effects, from the coming new crisis. The crisis is different in character from the previous global crisis in 2009 and it is characterized with higher negative impacts on the economic activity and unemployment of the countries. Methodology: The study examines the monetary policy tools used by the major central banks in particular the FR (Federal Reserve), the European central bank, the BoE (Bank of England) during the COVID-19 crisis. The data used are the official one, published by the Eurostat, European central bank, Federal Reserve, OECD. Through the methods of analysis and synthesis the effectiveness of the monetary policy, done by the covered central banks, is investigated. The data used are for the period 2007-2021. Results: The analyses indicate that the Bank of England, as well as the FR was in more privileged terms than the European central bank (ECB) before the COVID-19 crisis. Their main interest rates were positive and these banks could apply conventional instruments of policy at the beginning of the crisis before conducting the nonconventional policy tools. Implication: The study’s results are beneficial for central banks for countering the negative effects of the COVID-19 crisis, turning to the deep economic crisis afterward.

Suggested Citation

  • Gergana Ilieva Mihaylova-Borisova, 2021. "Comparative Study of Major Central Bank’s Monetary Policy in Response to the Pandemic Crisis," Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, University of National and World Economy, Institute for Economics and Politics, vol. 3(2), pages 96-106, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:96-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://faba.bg/index.php/faba/article/view/94/43
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:96-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yanko Hristozov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienwebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.