IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aan/journl/v3y2021i2p149-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Audit Tenure and Audit Market Concentration on Sharia Audit Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Fadhila Rizki Afifah

    (UIN Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia)

  • Tulus Suryanto

    (UIN Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia)

  • Yetri Martika Sari

    (UIN Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia)

Abstract

Purpose: The research is aimed to determine how the influence of audit tenure and audit market concentration on sharia audit quality, study in listed companies at Jakarta Islamic Index period 2016-2020. Design/Methodology/Approach: Associative method and quantitative approach. Use logistic regression models and purposive sampling to collect the data, and secondary data sources from annual financial statement and literature related to the topics. Findings: The results are audit tenure has negative influence with low significance, it was shown by sig value 0.083>0.05, audit market concentration has negative influence with low significance, it was shown by sig value 0.196>0.05, and audit tenure and audit market concentration have negative influence with low significance, it was shown by sig value 0.097>0.05. Practical Implications: The research provides a good starting point for deregulation about audit tenure and also recommendations for auditor to maintain their independence, the company give actual information and not overly restrict auditor in first engagement, and recommendations for next research are research period is longer, expand the object research, use moderation or intervening variable, and use other audit market concentration proxy. Originality/Value: The research contributes to the scientific literature related to the sharia audit, audit tenure, and audit market concentration topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Fadhila Rizki Afifah & Tulus Suryanto & Yetri Martika Sari, 2021. "The Influence of Audit Tenure and Audit Market Concentration on Sharia Audit Quality," Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, University of National and World Economy, Institute for Economics and Politics, vol. 3(2), pages 149-158, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:149-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://faba.bg/index.php/faba/article/view/100/47
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:149-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yanko Hristozov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienwebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.