IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aan/journl/v2y2020i1p11-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Opinion : Implication from Audit Evidence Evaluation in Using Professional Proficiency with Cautiousness and Accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Ely Suhayati

    (Department Accounting, Indonesia Computer University, Indonesia)

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of the study is the use professional proficiency with cautiousness and accuracy has effects on audit evidence evaluation that has implications for audit opinion Methodology : The research method that is used is descriptive verification with the help from Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square, in this research there are only 17 public accountant office with 25 partners in Bandung Results: Audit evidence evaluation which uses the ability to be cautious and accurate has implications on audit opinion. Implication : The use professional proficiency with cautiousness and accuracy is not only needed to evaluate the evidence, but also guarantee he quality of the audit results.

Suggested Citation

  • Ely Suhayati, 2020. "Audit Opinion : Implication from Audit Evidence Evaluation in Using Professional Proficiency with Cautiousness and Accuracy," Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, University of National and World Economy, Institute for Economics and Politics, vol. 2(1), pages 11-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:11-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://faba.bg/index.php/faba/article/view/29/19
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:11-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yanko Hristozov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienwebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.