IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aag/wpaper/v27y2023i2p145-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Online Professional Skills Training Programs for Lecturers: A Case Study of Vietnam National University, Hanoi, and its Implications on Decision Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Nghiem Xuan Huy

    (VNU Institute for Education Quality Assurance, Vietnam National University)

  • Ngo Tien Nhat

    (VNU Institute for Education Quality Assurance, Vietnam National University)

  • Nguyen Thi Tuyet Anh

    (VNU Institute for Education Quality Assurance, Vietnam National University; VNU University of Education, Vietnam National University)

  • Luu Quoc Dat

    (VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University)

  • Luu Huu Van

    (Academy of Policy and Development, Ministry of Planning and Investment)

Abstract

[Purpose] The application of decision science combines qualitative and quantitative frameworks to offer valuable insights into decision-making processes, spanning beyond business, computer science, public health, environmental science, economics, and finance, to include the field of education. Under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and digital transformation, online training has become a trend in many universities worldwide. This study aims to develop a new integrated multi-criteria decision-making model to determine the priority levels of factors impacting the effectiveness of online professional skills training programs for lecturers at the Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VNU-Hanoi). [Design/methodology/approach] A novel integrated approach has been developed, which combines the generalized fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This approach effectively determines the priority levels of influencing factors by using the fuzzy TOPSIS method with generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFNs). The data for this study was collected through in-depth interviews with experts and managers at the VNU-Hanoi. [Findings] The research findings indicate that learners and training program content are the most influential factors in the effectiveness of online training courses in enhancing lecturers’ professional competence at the VNU-Hanoi. Drawing on principles from Decision Science, several recommendations have been proposed for the VNU-Hanoi and its member universities and schools: (i) allocate sufficient time and provide resource support to enable lecturers’ participation in training courses; (ii) create comprehensive training content for lecturers, encompassing political ideology, ethics, professional knowledge, modern pedagogical skills, and life skills; (iii) strengthen the utilization of scientific, technological, and information technology skills, along with a digital transformation in management, teaching, and learning processes, to meet the broader development needs of society. The study results also demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed model in addressing practical issues. [Originality/value] This study proposes a novel integrated generalized fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach to determine the priority levels of factors influencing the effectiveness of online training courses in enhancing lecturers’ professional competence at the VNU-Hanoi. The study considers 21 sub-factors across five factors, including the policies of higher education institutions, training program content, learners, instructors, and technology for online training. This is new in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Nghiem Xuan Huy & Ngo Tien Nhat & Nguyen Thi Tuyet Anh & Luu Quoc Dat & Luu Huu Van, 2023. "Factors Influencing Online Professional Skills Training Programs for Lecturers: A Case Study of Vietnam National University, Hanoi, and its Implications on Decision Sciences," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 27(2), pages 145-165, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:27:y:2023:i:2:p:145-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iads.site/factors-influencing-online-professional-skills-training-programs-for-lecturers/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iads.site/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Factors-Influencing-Online-Professional-Skills-Training-Programs-for-Lecturers.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anh The Vo & Loan Thi-Hong Van & Duc Hong Vo & Michael Mcaleer, 2019. "Financial Inclusion And Macroeconomic Stability In Emerging And Frontier Markets," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    3. Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Hughes, D. Laurie & Coombs, Crispin & Constantiou, Ioanna & Duan, Yanqing & Edwards, John S. & Gupta, Babita & Lal, Banita & Misra, Santosh & Prashant, Prakhar & Raman, Ramakrishn, 2020. "Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    4. Truong Thi Hue & Nguyen Anh Tuan & Luu Huu Van & Luong Thuy Lien & Do Dieu Huong & Luong Tram Anh & Nghiem Xuan Huy & Luu Quoc Dat, 2022. "Prioritization of Factors Impacting Lecturer Research Productivity Using an Improved Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Muhammad Naveed & Muzammal Ilyas Sindhu & Shoaib Ali & Wing-Keung Wong, 2023. "To Invest or Not to Invest? Determinants of Low Stock Market Participation: Qualitative Perspective from Pakistan Stock Exchange," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 27(1), pages 113-171, March.
    6. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2023. "Comparative Sensitivity Analysis of Some Fuzzy AHP Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-41, December.
    2. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Tang, Jia-Wei & Chen, Chih-Jou, 2022. "Partnerships that go places: How to successfully market products from vendor partners at retail stores from the vendors’ perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Levialdi, Nathan & Menichini, Tamara, 2019. "Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 155-168.
    4. Raman Kumar Goyal & Sakshi Kaushal, 2018. "Deriving crisp and consistent priorities for fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria systems using non-linear constrained optimization," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 195-209, June.
    5. Zhü, Kèyù, 2014. "Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 209-217.
    6. Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione & Francesco Amato & Santolo Cozzolino & Giuseppe Russo & Maria Romano & Giovanni Improta, 2022. "A Hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process and Likert Scale Approach for the Quality Assessment of Medical Education Programs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai & Li, Dong, 2015. "A case study of an integrated fuzzy methodology for green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 212-223.
    8. Animesh Debnath & Jagannath Roy & Kajal Chatterjee & Samarjit Kar, 2018. "Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility Based on Fuzzy Analytic Networking Process-Based Balance Scorecard Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1203-1235, July.
    9. Ozalp Vayvay & Yigit Ozcan & Maria Manuela Cruz-Cunha, 2012. "ERP consultant selection problem using AHP, fuzzy AHP and ANP: A case study in Turkey," E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., E3 Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 106-117.
    10. Elham Amini & Mohammad Baniasadi & Hossein Vahidi & Hossein Nematollahi & Mehrdad Khatami & Mozafar Amandadi & Leila Malekyan & Hamid Safarpour, 2020. "Affecting Factors of Knowledge-Based Companies Using Fuzzy AHP Model, Case Study Tehran University Enterprise Park," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 574-592, June.
    11. Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon, 2022. "An integrated FAHP–ZODP approach for strategic marketing information system project selection," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1792-1809, September.
    12. Deepak Lamba & Devendra K. Yadav & Akhilesh Barve & Ganapati Panda, 2020. "Prioritizing barriers in reverse logistics of E-commerce supply chain using fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 381-403, June.
    13. Caprioli, Caterina & Bottero, Marta, 2021. "Addressing complex challenges in transformations and planning: A fuzzy spatial multicriteria analysis for identifying suitable locations for urban infrastructures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Rezaei, Jafar & Ortt, Roland, 2013. "Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 75-84.
    15. Marcus V. C. Fagundes & Bernd Hellingrath & Francisco G. M. Freires, 2021. "Supplier Selection Risk: A New Computer-Based Decision-Making System with Fuzzy Extended AHP," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Ruchi Mishra & Rajesh Kr Singh & Venkatesh Mani, 2023. "A hybrid multi criteria decision-making framework to facilitate omnichannel adoption in logistics: an empirical case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 685-719, July.
    17. Heo, Eunnyeong & Kim, Jinsoo & Boo, Kyung-Jin, 2010. "Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2214-2220, October.
    18. Faramondi, Luca & Oliva, Gabriele & Setola, Roberto & Bozóki, Sándor, 2023. "Robustness to rank reversal in pairwise comparison matrices based on uncertainty bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 676-688.
    19. Hsin-Chieh Wu & Toly Chen & Chin-Hau Huang, 2020. "A Piecewise Linear FGM Approach for Efficient and Accurate FAHP Analysis: Smart Backpack Design as an Example," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Grošelj, Petra & Hodges, Donald G. & Zadnik Stirn, Lidija, 2016. "Participatory and multi-criteria analysis for forest (ecosystem) management: A case study of Pohorje, Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 80-86.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TOPSIS; the generalized fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process; Generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers; Lecturers' professional competence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:27:y:2023:i:2:p:145-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vincent Pan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfasitw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.