IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020ispecial2p1160-1177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Teams as a Supply Chain Integration Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Jagoda
  • Tomasz Kolakowski
  • Jakub Marcinkowski

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to confirm that inter-functional or inter-organizational project teams are one of the supply chain integration tools. Design/Methodology/Approach: A theoretical framework is based on the identification of issues and trends discussed in the literature on the subject grouped in two scientific bases: Scopus and Web of Science. The empirical framework analysis of the research data through statistical analysis has been used. Findings: Cross-functional and cross-organizational teams’ improvement may enable companies to develop stronger relationships with members of their supply chain, which will affect its integration. Practical Implications: The presented findings and associated theoretical framework offer useful new insights regarding the process of supply chain integration and an opportunity for future research. A more in-depth analysis may also be conducted regarding supply chain integration levels. Originality/value: The paper is among the first to focus the role of inter-functional or inter-organizational project teams on supply chain integration process. While the structuring of integrated “hard” supply chain flows is well established, much less is understood concerning the contribution of such “soft” areas

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Jagoda & Tomasz Kolakowski & Jakub Marcinkowski, 2020. "Project Teams as a Supply Chain Integration Tool," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 1160-1177.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special2:p:1160-1177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1934/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward G. Anderson Jr. & Aravind Chandrasekaran & Alison Davis-Blake & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Managing Distributed Product Development Projects: Integration Strategies for Time-Zone and Language Barriers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 42-69, March.
    2. Wolfgang Ulaga, 2003. "Capturing value creation in business relationships: A customer perspective," Post-Print hal-00484963, HAL.
    3. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & V. Krishnan, 2009. "Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1152-1169, July.
    4. Themistocleous, Marinos & Irani, Zahir & Love, Peter E. D., 2004. "Evaluating the integration of supply chain information systems: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 393-405, December.
    5. M. Motiar Rahman & Mohan Kumaraswamy, 2005. "Assembling integrated project teams for joint risk management," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 365-375.
    6. Monica Grosso & Sandro Castaldo & Fabrizio Zerbini, 2009. "Integration of third parties within existing dyads : An exploratory study of category management programs (CMPs)," Post-Print hal-02312829, HAL.
    7. Sanjay T. Menon, 2012. "Human resource practices, supply chain performance, and wellbeing," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 769-785, October.
    8. Hannah J. Stolze & Diane A. Mollenkopf & LaDonna Thornton & Michael J. Brusco & Daniel J. Flint, 2018. "Supply Chain and Marketing Integration: Tension in Frontline Social Networks," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(3), pages 3-21, July.
    9. Mary Beth Pinto & Jeffrey K. Pinto & John E. Prescott, 1993. "Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1281-1297, October.
    10. Kumar, Maneesh & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez, 2020. "Synergetic effect of lean and green on innovation: A resource-based perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 469-479.
    11. Antony Paulraj & Injazz J. Chen, 2005. "Strategic supply management: theory and practice," International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 457-477.
    12. Ambrose, Scott C. & Matthews, Lucy M. & Rutherford, Brian N., 2018. "Cross-functional teams and social identity theory: A study of sales and operations planning (S&OP)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 270-278.
    13. Eley Suzana Kasim & Indra Devi Rajamanoharan & Normah Hj. Omar, 2012. "An integrated supply chain management model for value creation: case evidence," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3/4), pages 379-401.
    14. Fawcett, Stanley E. & Magnan, Gregory M., 2004. "Ten guiding principles for high-impact SCM," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 67-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lech A. Bukowski & Pawel Sobczak, 2021. "Creating Reliable and Resilient Logistics Organizations for Unpredictable Conditions and Unexpected Future," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 143-161.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van den Broeke, Maud & Paparoidamis, Nicholas, 2021. "Engaging in or escaping co-creation? An analytical model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Limin Su & Yongchao Cao & Wenjuan Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Supply Chain Operation Decisions and Coordination Strategies Considering the Consumers’ Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Nicoletti, Sergio & Nicolo, Fabio, 1998. "A concurrent engineering decision model: Management of the project activities information flows," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 115-127, January.
    4. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    5. Abdelmoety, Ziad Hassan & Aboul-Dahab, Sameh & Agag, Gomaa, 2022. "A cross cultural investigation of retailers commitment to CSR and customer citizenship behaviour: The role of ethical standard and value relevance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Isaac Zúñiga Aguilar, 2022. "Neuroeconomics in Cooperatives: Hierarchy of Emotional Patterns in the Collective Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    7. Shoeb Ahmed Memon & Steve Rowlinson & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Hafiz Zahoor, 2021. "Collaborative Behavior in Relational Contracting Projects in Hong Kong—A Contractor’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Mittal, Divya & Agrawal, Shiv Ratan, 2016. "Price transparency reflects assurance and reliability," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 43-51.
    9. Roma, Paolo & Perrone, Giovanni, 2016. "Cooperation among competitors: A comparison of cost-sharing mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 172-182.
    10. Cécile CEZANNE & Laurence SAGLIETTO, 2014. "Human Capital-Intensive Firms and Symbolic Value Creation," Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 70-88.
    11. Goh, Shao Hung & Eldridge, Stephen, 2019. "Sales and Operations Planning: The effect of coordination mechanisms on supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 80-94.
    12. Haberstroh, Martin & Wolf, Joachim, 2005. "Individuelle Autonomie in Projektteams," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 585, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    13. Burcu Tan & Edward G. Anderson, Jr. & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2020. "Platform Pricing and Investment to Drive Third-Party Value Creation in Two-Sided Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 217-239, March.
    14. Timothy Kiessling & Lars Isaksson & Burze Yasar, 2016. "Market Orientation and CSR: Performance Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 269-284, August.
    15. Casenave, Eric & Klarmann, Martin, 2020. "The accountability paradox: How holding marketers accountable hinders alignment with short-term marketing goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 95-108.
    16. Elodie Gardet & Pierre-Laurent Felix, 2013. "Methods for distributing results in exploratory partnerships," Post-Print hal-01287002, HAL.
    17. Feng Li & Yalong Wang, 2022. "Study on the Evolutionary Game of Cooperation and Innovation in Science and Technology Town Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Bremmers, Harry J. & Sabidussi, Anna, 2009. "Co-innovation: what are the success factors?," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 3(1-2), pages 1-8.
    19. Morgan X. Yang & Ji Li & Irina Y. Yu & Kevin J. Zeng & Jian‐Min (James) Sun, 2019. "Environmentally sustainable or economically sustainable? The effect of Chinese manufacturing firms' corporate sustainable strategy on their green performances," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 989-997, September.
    20. Aasheesh Dixit & Patanjal Kumar & Suresh Jakhar, 2021. "Airport-Airline Coordination with Economic, Environmental and Social Considerations," Papers 2110.11694, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Supply chain integration; inter-functional integration; inter-organizational integration; project teams.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special2:p:1160-1177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.