Single-crossing random utility models

Citations

Cited by:

1. Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean & John Leahy, 2022. "Rationally Inattentive Behavior: Characterizing and Generalizing Shannon Entropy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(6), pages 1676-1715.
   • Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean & John Leahy, 2017. "Rationally Inattentive Behavior: Characterizing and Generalizing Shannon Entropy," NBER Working Papers 23652, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
2. Roy Allen & Paweł Dziewulski & John Rehbeck, 2024. "Revealed statistical consumer theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 77(3), pages 823-847, May.
   • Roy Allen & Pawel Dziewulski & John Rehbeck, 2019. "Revealed Statistical Consumer Theory," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20195, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
   • Pawel Dziewulski & Roy Allen & John Rehbeck, 2021. "Revealed statistical consumer theory," Working Paper Series 0221, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
   • Roy Allen & Pawel Dziewulski & John Rehbeck, 2019. "Revealed statistical consumer theory," Working Paper Series 1119, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
3. Turansick, Christopher, 2022. "Identification in the random utility model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
   • Christopher Turansick, 2021. "Identification in the Random Utility Model," Papers 2102.05570, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
4. Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2019. "Dynamic Random Utility," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(6), pages 1941-2002, November.
   • Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2017. "Dynamic Random Utility," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2092R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Nov 2018.
   • Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2017. "Dynamic Random Utility," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2092, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
5. Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2023. "Random utility and limited consideration," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 71-116, January.
   • Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2018. "Random Utility and Limited Consideration," Papers 1812.09619, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
6. Paul H. Y. Cheung & Yusufcan Masatlioglu, 2025. "Frame-dependent Random Utility," Papers 2502.00209, arXiv.org.
7. Kashaev, Nail & Aguiar, Victor H., 2022. "A random attention and utility model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
   • Nail Kashaev & Victor H. Aguiar, 2021. "A Random Attention and Utility Model," Papers 2105.11268, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
   • Nail Kashaev & Victor H. Aguiar, 2022. "A Random Attention and Utility Model," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20223, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
8. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2018. "Dual random utility maximisation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 162-182.
9. Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2021. "Discrete Choice under Risk with Limited Consideration," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(6), pages 1972-2006, June.
   • Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2019. "Discrete choice under risk with limited consideration," CeMMAP working papers CWP08/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
   • Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2019. "Discrete Choice under Risk with Limited Consideration," Papers 1902.06629, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
   • Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2020. "Discrete choice under risk with limited consideration," CeMMAP working papers CWP28/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
10. Li, Boyao, 2023. "Random utility models with status quo bias," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
11. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2016. "Stochastic representatitve agent," Economics Working Papers 1536, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    • Miguel à ngel Ballester & Jose Apesteguia, 2016. "Stochastic Representative Agent," Working Papers 928, Barcelona School of Economics.
12. Heufer, Jan & van Bruggen, Paul & Yang, Jingni, 2020. "Giving According to Agreement," Discussion Paper 2020-035, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    • Heufer, Jan & van Bruggen, Paul & Yang, Jingni, 2020. "Giving According to Agreement," Other publications TiSEM 19e0d60e-efcb-4e7c-b163-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
13. Yaron Azrieli & John Rehbeck, 2022. "Marginal stochastic choice," Papers 2208.08492, arXiv.org.
14. Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Fehr, Ernst & Netzer, Nick, 2021. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 129(6), pages 1828-1877.
    • Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2021. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(6), pages 1828-1877.
    • Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Fehr, Ernst & Netzer, Nick, 2018. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," IZA Discussion Papers 11918, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    • Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy," ECON - Working Papers 306, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jun 2020.
    • Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences when Choices Are Noisy," CESifo Working Paper Series 7333, CESifo.
    • Carlos Alos-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell - Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy," Papers 1811.02497, arXiv.org.
15. Efe A. Ok & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2023. "Measuring Stochastic Rationality," Papers 2303.08202, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
16. Natalia Lazzati & John K.-H. Quah & Koji Shirai, 2018. "Nonparametric analysis of monotone choice," Discussion Paper Series 184, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
17. Angelo Petralia, 2024. "Harmful choices," Papers 2408.01317, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
18. Daniele Caliari & Henrik Petri, 2024. "Irrational Random Utility Models," Papers 2403.10208, arXiv.org.
19. Caliari, Daniele, 2023. "Rationality is not consistency," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2023-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
20. Demirkan, Yusufcan & Kimya, Mert, 2020. "Hazard rate, stochastic choice and consideration sets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 142-150.
21. Sprumont, Yves, 2025. "Randomized collective choices based on a fractional tournament," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 20(1), January.
22. Furtado, Bruno A. & Nascimento, Leandro & Riella, Gil, 2023. "Rational choice with full-comparability domains," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 124-135.
23. Guo, Liang, 2021. "Contextual deliberation and the choice-valuation preference reversal," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
24. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
25. Matheus Costa & Paulo Henrique Ramos & Gil Riella, 2020. "Single-crossing choice correspondences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(1), pages 69-86, January.
26. Apesteguia, Jose & Ballester, Miguel A., 2023. "Random utility models with ordered types and domains," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
27. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2018. "Dual random utility maximisation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 162-182.
    • Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti, 2016. "Dual Random Utility Maximisation," Discussion Paper Series, School of Economics and Finance 201605, School of Economics and Finance, University of St Andrews, revised 12 Mar 2017.
28. Valkanova, Kremena, 2024. "Revealed preference domains from random choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 288-304.
29. Piermont, Evan, 2022. "Disentangling strict and weak choice in random expected utility models," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
30. Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
31. Yang, Erya & Kopylov, Igor, 2023. "Random quasi-linear utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
32. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2019. "Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?," MPRA Paper 93126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
33. Petri, Henrik, 2023. "Binary single-crossing random utility models," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 311-320.
34. Lu, Jay & Saito, Kota, 2018. "Random intertemporal choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 780-815.
35. Pennesi, Daniele, 2021. "Intertemporal discrete choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 690-706.
    • D. Pennesi, 2016. "Intertemporal discrete choice," Working Papers wp1061, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
36. D. Pennesi, 2016. "Deciding fast and slow," Working Papers wp1082, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.