IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/spr/weltar/v129y1993i3p488-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The New Growth Theory and Coasean economics: Institutions to capture externalities

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. ., 2013. "Diversity and the evolution of competitive economic systems," Chapters, in: Competition, Diversity and Economic Performance, chapter 6, pages 109-131, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  2. Siebert, Horst & Stolpe, Michael, 2001. "Technology and economic performance in the German economy," Kiel Working Papers 1035, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  3. Jarle Moen, 2005. "Is Mobility of Technical Personnel a Source of R&D Spillovers?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(1), pages 81-114, January.
  4. Dominique Foray, 2012. "The Fragility of Experiential Knowledge," Chapters, in: Richard Arena & Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  5. Arpaia, Alfonso & Pérez, Esther & Pichelmann, Karl, 2009. "Understanding labour income share dynamics in Europe," MPRA Paper 15649, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  6. Straubhaar Thomas, 1999. "Brain Gain: Wohin gehen die Wissensträger in Zukunft?," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 50(1), pages 233-258, January.
  7. Steinle, Claus & Schiele, Holger, 2002. "When do industries cluster?: A proposal on how to assess an industry's propensity to concentrate at a single region or nation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 849-858, August.
  8. Steve Dowrick, 2003. "Ideas and Education: Level or Growth Effects?," NBER Working Papers 9709, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  9. Dunn Malcolm H., 2000. "Wachstum und endogener technologischer Wandel - Eine Kritik des Wachstumsmodells von Paul Romer aus der Perspektive der Evolutorischen Ökonomik," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 51(1), pages 277-300, January.
  10. Alex Hoen, 2001. "Clusters: Determinants and Effects," CPB Memorandum 17, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  11. Wilhelm, Rainer, 1996. "Endogene Wachstumstheorien und ihre Implikationen für Entwicklungsländer," Discussion Papers in Development Economics 20, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Institute for Development Economics.
  12. Klump Rainer & Plagens Manfred, 2000. "Ist das Gesundheitswesen in Deutschland ein „Nachfragemotor“ für Fortschritte in der Medizintechnik?: Eine Analyse der Beziehungen zwischen Gesundheitssystem und medizinisch- technischen Innovationen ," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 51(1), pages 355-382, January.
  13. Wolfgang Maennig & Helmut Wagner, 1995. "Unified structural adjustment policy in Europe?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 30(1), pages 25-30, January.
  14. Aneta Ejsmont & Magdalena Majchrzak & Jacek Grzywacz, 2021. "Competitive Advantage in Co-operation of Enterprises Using Kaizen Costing Concept in Times of Extraordinary Dangers," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 377-396.
  15. Soete, Luc & Weel, Bas ter, 1999. "Schumpeter and the Knowledge-Based Economy: On Technology and Competition Policy," Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
  16. Hollanders, Hugo & Weel, Bas ter, 1999. "Skill-Biased Technical Change: On Endogenous Growth, Wage Inequality and Government Intervention," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
  17. Russell Thomson, 2010. "Tax Policy and R&D Investment by Australian Firms," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 86(273), pages 260-280, June.
  18. Atanas Leonidov, 2006. "Endogenous Theory of Growth and Main Economic Schools," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 38-70.
  19. Steve Dowrick, 2004. "Ideas and Education: Level or Growth Effects and Their Implications for Australia," NBER Chapters, in: Growth and Productivity in East Asia, pages 9-40, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  20. Dominique Foray & Martin Woerter, 2021. "The formation of Coasean institutions to provide university knowledge for innovation: a case study and econometric evidence for Switzerland," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1584-1610, October.
  21. Tamara Todorova, 2007. "The Coase Theorem Revisited: Implications for Economic Transition," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 35(2), pages 189-201, June.
  22. Alex Hoen, 2001. "Clusters: Determinants and Effects," CPB Memorandum 17.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  23. Soete, Luc & Weel, Bas ter, 1999. "Innovation, Knowledge Creation and Technology Policy in Europe," Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
  24. Clem Tisdell, 1999. "Diversity And Economic Evolution: Failures Of Competitive Economic Systems," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 17(2), pages 156-165, April.
  25. Morris Teubal, 1997. "Restructuring and Embeddeness Of Business Enterprises - Towards An Innovation System Perspective On Diffusion Policy," DRUID Working Papers 97-6, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
  26. Steve Dowrick, 1995. "The Determinants of Long-Run Growth," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Palle Andersen & Jacqueline Dwyer & David Gruen (ed.),Productivity and Growth, Reserve Bank of Australia.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.