IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/oup/oxford/v8y1992i3p24-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Industrial Groups as Systems of Contractual Governance

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Heinrich, Ralph P., 1999. "Complementarities in Corporate Governance - A Survey of the Literature with Special Emphasis on Japan," Kiel Working Papers 947, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  2. Tylecote, Andrew & Hirata, Mitsuhiro, 1993. "Technological Innovation and Performance Pressures in Europe and Japan," Hitotsubashi Journal of commerce and management, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 28(1), pages 61-76, December.
  3. Rupayan Pal, 2010. "How much should you own? Cross-ownership and privatization," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2010-015, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
  4. Wim Suyker & Henri de Groot, 2006. "China and the Dutch economy," CPB Document 127.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  5. Panayotis Kapopoulos & Sophia Lazaretou, 2009. "Does corporate ownership structure matter for economic growth? A cross-country analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 155-172.
  6. Short, Helen & Zhang, Hao & Keasey, Kevin, 2002. "The link between dividend policy and institutional ownership," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 105-122, March.
  7. Jiatao Li & J. Richard Harrison, 2008. "National Culture and the Composition and Leadership Structure of Boards of Directors," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 375-385, September.
  8. Rupayan Pal, 2010. "How Much Should You Own? Cross-ownership and Privatization," Working Papers id:2810, eSocialSciences.
  9. Yoshiro Miwa & J. Mark Ramseyer, 2005. "Does Relationship Banking Matter? The Myth of the Japanese Main Bank," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 261-302, July.
  10. Branston, J. Robert & Cowling, Keith & Sugden, Roger, 2002. "Corporate Governance And The Public Interest," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 626, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  11. Roberto Carlos Klann & Ilse Maria Beuren, 2011. "Characteristics of companies that influence their voluntary disclosure of performance indicators," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 8(2), pages 92-113, April.
  12. Wu, Hsueh-Liang, 2011. "Can minority state ownership influence firm value? Universal and contingency views of its governance effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 839-845, August.
  13. Michael Carney & Eric Gedajlovic & Sujit Sur, 2011. "Corporate governance and stakeholder conflict," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(3), pages 483-507, August.
  14. Yoshiro Miwa & J. Mark Ramseyer, 2003. "Does Relationship Banking Matter? Japanese Bank-Borrower Ties in Good Times and Bad," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-239, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
  15. Morley, Bruce, 2002. "Exchange rates and stock prices: implications for European convergence," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 523-526, August.
  16. Bhabra, Gurmeet Singh, 2007. "Insider ownership and firm value in New Zealand," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 142-154, April.
  17. Short, Helen & Keasey, Kevin, 1999. "Managerial ownership and the performance of firms: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 79-101, March.
  18. Lynn, Leonard H. & Mohan Reddy, N. & Aram, John D., 1996. "Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 91-106, January.
  19. Branston, J. Robert & Cowling, Keith & Sugden, Roger, 2001. "Corporate Governance and the Public Interest," Economic Research Papers 269400, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
  20. Free Huizinga & S. Smulders, 2009. "Varieties and the terms of trade," CPB Discussion Paper 127.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  21. Ruiz-Mallorquí, María Victoria & Santana-Martín, Domingo J., 2011. "Dominant institutional owners and firm value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 118-129, January.
  22. Pedersen, Torben & Thomsen, Steen, 2001. "The Causal Relationship between Insider Ownership, Owner Identity and Market Valuation among the Largest European Companies," Working Papers 15-2001, Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Economics and Management.
  23. Christopher Nobes & Alan Roberts, 2000. "Towards a Unifying Model of Systems of Law, Corporate Financing, Accounting and Corporate Governance," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 10(20), pages 26-34, March.
  24. Christian Engelen, 2015. "The effects of managerial discretion on moral hazard related behaviour: German evidence on agency costs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(4), pages 927-960, November.
  25. Sharon Belenzon & Tomer Berkovitz & Luis A. Rios, 2013. "Capital Markets and Firm Organization: How Financial Development Shapes European Corporate Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1326-1343, June.
  26. Alessandro Zattoni, 2011. "Who Should Control a Corporation? Toward a Contingency Stakeholder Model for Allocating Ownership Rights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 255-274, October.
  27. Shann Turnbull, 2017. "Grounding a Theory of Firms in the Natural Sciences," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 159-186, April.
  28. Jan Bonenkamp, 2005. "A comparison of catching-up premium rate models," CPB Memorandum 127.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  29. Bolt, Wilko & Peeters, Marga, 1998. "Corporate governance in the Netherlands," MPRA Paper 28694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.