IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/kap/jproda/v20y2003i3p323-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Identification and Use of Efficient Faces and Facets in DEA

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Cooper, William W. & Ruiz, Jose L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2007. "Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 443-458, July.
  2. Asmild, Mette & Hougaard, Jens Leth & Olesen, Ole B., 2013. "Testing over-representation of observations in subsets of a DEA technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 88-96.
  3. Aigner, Lorenz & Asmild, Mette, 2023. "Identifying the most important set of weights when modelling bad outputs with the weak disposability approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 751-759.
  4. Hirofumi Fukuyama & Yong Tan, 2021. "Corporate social behaviour: Is it good for efficiency in the Chinese banking industry?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 306(1), pages 383-413, November.
  5. Panagiotis Ravanos & Giannis Karagiannis, 2022. "In search for the most preferred solution in value efficiency analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 203-220, December.
  6. Amineh Ghazi & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Masoud Sanei, 2020. "Hybrid efficiency measurement and target setting based on identifying defining hyperplanes of the PPS with negative data," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 1055-1092, June.
  7. Chia-Yen Lee, 2017. "Directional marginal productivity: a foundation of meta-data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(5), pages 544-555, May.
  8. Amineh Ghazi & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfı & Masoud Sanei, 2022. "Finding the strong efficient frontier and strong defining hyperplanes of production possibility set using multiple objective linear programming," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 165-198, March.
  9. Maria Portela & Emmanuel Thanassoulis, 2006. "Zero weights and non-zero slacks: Different solutions to the same problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 129-147, July.
  10. Mozaffari, Mohammad Reza & Dadkhah, Fatemeh & Jablonsky, Josef & Wanke, Peter Fernandes, 2020. "Finding efficient surfaces in DEA-R models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
  11. Juan Aparicio & Jesus T. Pastor & Jose L. Sainz-Pardo & Fernando Vidal, 2020. "Estimating and decomposing overall inefficiency by determining the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 747-770, June.
  12. Mehdiloozad, Mahmood & Mirdehghan, S. Morteza & Sahoo, Biresh K. & Roshdi, Israfil, 2015. "On the identification of the global reference set in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 779-788.
  13. Finn Førsund & Lennart Hjalmarsson & Vladimir Krivonozhko & Oleg Utkin, 2007. "Calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models: direct and indirect approaches," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 45-56, October.
  14. Juan Aparicio & José Ruiz & Inmaculada Sirvent, 2007. "Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 209-218, December.
  15. Ando, Kazutoshi & Minamide, Masato & Sekitani, Kazuyuki & Shi, Jianming, 2017. "Monotonicity of minimum distance inefficiency measures for Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 232-243.
  16. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Sekitani, Kazuyuki, 2009. "An occurrence of multiple projections in DEA-based measurement of technical efficiency: Theoretical comparison among DEA models from desirable properties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 764-794, July.
  17. Lozano, Sebastián & Khezri, Somayeh, 2021. "Network DEA smallest improvement approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
  18. Amatatsu, Hirofumi & Ueda, Tohru, 2012. "Measurement of simultaneous scale and mix changes in inputs and outputs using DEA facets and RTS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 752-761.
  19. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Sekitani, Kazuyuki, 2007. "Measurement of returns to scale using a non-radial DEA model: A range-adjusted measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1918-1946, February.
  20. A. Ghazi & F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, 2023. "Marginal rates in DEA using defining hyperplanes of PPS with CRS technology," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-37, March.
  21. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Sekitani, Kazuyuki, 2012. "Decomposing the efficient frontier of the DEA production possibility set into a smallest number of convex polyhedrons by mixed integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 165-174.
  22. Aparicio, Juan & Pastor, Jesus T., 2014. "Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 51-57.
  23. Aparicio, Juan & Pastor, Jesús T. & Vidal, Fernando & Zofío, José L., 2017. "Evaluating productive performance: A new approach based on the product-mix problem consistent with Data Envelopment Analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 134-144.
  24. Kuosmanen, Timo & Johnson, Andrew, 2017. "Modeling joint production of multiple outputs in StoNED: Directional distance function approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 792-801.
  25. Hirofumi Fukuyama & Kazuyuki Sekitani, 2012. "An efficiency measure satisfying the Dmitruk–Koshevoy criteria on DEA technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 131-143, October.
  26. Heesche, Emil & Asmild, Mette, 2022. "Incorporating quality in economic regulatory benchmarking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
  27. Wei, Quanling & Yan, Hong & Xiong, Lin, 2008. "A bi-objective generalized data envelopment analysis model and point-to-set mapping projection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 855-876, November.
  28. Washio, Satoshi & Yamada, Syuuji & Tanaka, Tamaki & Tanino, Tetsuzo, 2012. "Improvements by analyzing the efficient frontier in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 173-184.
  29. Bogetoft, Peter & Hougaard, Jens Leth & Smilgins, Aleksandrs, 2016. "Applied cost allocation: The DEA–Aumann–Shapley approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 667-678.
  30. Giannis Karagiannis & Panagiotis Ravanos, 2023. "On Value Efficiency Analysis and Cone-Ratio Data Envelopment Analysis models," Discussion Paper Series 2023_03, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised Mar 2023.
  31. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2020. "A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
  32. Ramón, Nuria & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2020. "Cross-benchmarking for performance evaluation: Looking across best practices of different peer groups using DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  33. Asmild, Mette & Zhu, Minyan, 2016. "Controlling for the use of extreme weights in bank efficiency assessments during the financial crisis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 999-1015.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.