IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/respol/v47y2018i9p1729-1740.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The wider impacts of high-technology employment: Evidence from U.S. cities

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Neil Lee & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2021. "Entrepreneurship and the fight against poverty in US cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 31-52, February.
  2. Richard Gardiner & Petr Hajek, 2024. "The Role of R&D Intensity and Education in a Model of Inequality, Growth and Risk of Poverty: Evidence from Europe," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1845-1870, March.
  3. Emil Evenhuis & Neil Lee & Ron Martin & Peter Tyler, 2021. "Rethinking the political economy of place: challenges of productivity and inclusion," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(1), pages 3-24.
  4. Kemeny, Tom & Storper, Michael, 2022. "The changing shape of spatial inequality in the United States," SocArXiv wnd8t_v1, Center for Open Science.
  5. Güvercin, Deniz, 2022. "Digitalization and populism: Cross-country evidence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
  6. Ioramashvili, Carolin, 2024. "Technological invention and local labour markets: evidence from France, Germany and the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123630, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  7. Nathan, Max, 2022. "Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
  8. Maryann Feldman & Frederick Guy & Simona Iammarino, 2021. "Regional income disparities, monopoly and finance," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(1), pages 25-49.
  9. Kemeny, Thomas & Storper, Michael, 2020. "Superstar cities and left-behind places: disruptive innovation, labor demand, and interregional inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103312, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  10. Katherine Parsons & Rick Delbridge & Elvira Uyarra & David Waite & Robert Huggins & Kevin Morgan, 2024. "Advancing inclusive innovation policy in the UK’s second-tier city-regions," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 44(3), pages 313-336, September.
  11. Doris Kwon & Olav Sorenson, 2023. "The Silicon Valley Syndrome," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 344-368, March.
  12. Kemeny, Tom & Storper, Michael, 2022. "The changing shape of spatial inequality in the United States," SocArXiv wnd8t, Center for Open Science.
  13. Mingzhi Zhang & Hongyu Liu & Yangyue Su & Xiangyu Zhou & Zhaocheng Li & Chao Chen, 2022. "Assessment and Decomposition of Regional Land Use Efficiency of the Service Sector in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
  14. Ioramashvili, Carolin, 2024. "Technological invention and local labour markets: Evidence from France, Germany and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
  15. Tom Kemeny & Michael Storper, 2024. "The Changing Shape of Spatial Income Disparities in the United States," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 100(1), pages 1-30, January.
  16. Frederick Guy, 0. "Who wants their city to become a world city? Comment on “Expanding the international trade and investment policy agenda: The role of cities and services”," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-5.
  17. Lee, Neil & Clarke, Stephen, 2019. "Do low-skilled workers gain from high-tech employment growth? High-technology multipliers, employment and wages in Britain," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
  18. Qiang Li & Jason F. Kovacs & Geun Hee Choi, 2021. "High-technology employment growth in China: geographic disparities in economic structure and sectoral performance," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1025-1064, November.
  19. Donald R. Grimes & Penelope B. Prime & Mary Beth Walker, 2019. "Geographical Variation in Wages of Workers in Low-Wage Service Occupations: A U.S. Metropolitan Area Analysis," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(2), pages 121-133, May.
  20. Frederick Guy, 2020. "Who wants their city to become a world city? Comment on “Expanding the international trade and investment policy agenda: The role of cities and services”," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(3), pages 224-228, September.
  21. Li, Shiyuan & Li, Yumin, 2021. "The Impact of Mobile Phone Adoption on Income Inequality," MPRA Paper 110969, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  22. Jiaxin Wu & Hongjuan Yang & Tanveer Ahmed, 2023. "An assessment of the policy of poverty alleviation in continuous poverty-stricken areas: evidence from Yunnan Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9757-9777, September.
  23. Madeline Streiff Buitelaar, 2019. "Cui Bono? Assessing Community Engagement in San Francisco Community Benefit Agreements," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, March.
  24. von Borries, Alvaro & Grillitsch, Markus & Lundquist, Karl-Johan, 2022. "Geographies of Low-Income Jobs: The concentration of low-income jobs, the knowledge economy and labor market polarization in Sweden, 1990-2018," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
  25. Taner Osman & Tom Kemeny, 2022. "Local job multipliers revisited," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 150-170, January.
  26. Karen Chapple & Jae Sik Jeon, 2021. "Big Tech on the Block: Examining the Impact of Tech Campuses on Local Housing Markets in the San Francisco Bay Area," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(4), pages 351-369, November.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.