An externality-robust auction: Theory and experimental evidence

Citations

Cited by:

1. Thomas Giebe & Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Martin G. Kocher & Simeon Schudy, 2024. "Cross-game learning and cognitive ability in auctions," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(1), pages 80-108, March.
   • Thomas Giebe & Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Martin G. Kocher & Simeon Schudy, 2021. "Cross-Game Learning and Cognitive Ability in Auctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9396, CESifo.
   • Giebe, Thomas & Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Kocher, Martin G. & Schudy, Simeon, 2022. "Cross-game Learning and Cognitive Ability in Auctions," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 358, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
2. Duk Gyoo Kim & Daehong Min & John Wooders, 2022. "Viable Nash Equilibria: An Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 9913, CESifo.
3. Bierbrauer, Felix & Netzer, Nick, 2016. "Mechanism design and intentions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 557-603.
   • Felix Bierbrauer & Nick Netzer, 2012. "Mechanism Design and Intentions," Working Paper Series in Economics 53, University of Cologne, Department of Economics, revised 21 Aug 2012.
   • Felix Bierbrauer & Nick Netzer, 2012. "Mechanism design and intentions," ECON - Working Papers 066, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Apr 2014.
   • Felix Bierbrauer & Nick Netzer, 2016. "Mechanism Design and Intentions," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2016_04, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
4. Mill, Wladislaw, 2017. "The spite motive in third price auctions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 71-73.
5. Ehrhart, Karl-Martin & Ott, Marion, 2019. "How the auction design influences procurement prices: An experiment," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
6. Theo Offerman & Giorgia Romagnoli & Andreas Ziegler, 2022. "Why are open ascending auctions popular? The role of information aggregation and behavioral biases," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(2), pages 787-823, May.
   • Theo Offerman & Giorgia Romagnoli & Andreas Ziegler, 2020. "Why are open ascending auctions popular? The role of information aggregation and behavioral biases," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-071/I, Tinbergen Institute.
7. Bierbrauer, Felix & Ockenfels, Axel & Pollak, Andreas & Rückert, Désirée, 2017. "Robust mechanism design and social preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 59-80.
   • Felix Bierbrauer & Axel Ockenfels & Andreas Pollak & Désirée Rückert, 2014. "Robust Mechanism Design and Social Preferences," CESifo Working Paper Series 4713, CESifo.
8. Sang-Hyun Kim & Chulyoung Kim & Jaeok Park & Jinhyuk Lee, 2022. "First-Price and Second-Price Auctions with Externalities: An Experimental Study," Working papers 2022rwp-199, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
9. Kassas, Bachir & Palma, Marco A. & Anderson, David P., 2018. "Fine-tuning willingness-to-pay estimates in second price auctions for market goods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 50-61.
10. Oliver Kirchkamp & Wladislaw Mill, 2019. "Spite vs. risk: explaining overbidding," CESifo Working Paper Series 7631, CESifo.
11. Boaz Zik, 2021. "Ex-post implementation with social preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(3), pages 467-485, April.
12. Daske, Thomas, 2021. "The Incentive Costs of Welfare Judgments," EconStor Preprints 230318, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
13. Daske, Thomas, 2019. "Efficient Incentives in Social Networks: "Gamification" and the Coase Theorem," EconStor Preprints 193148, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Daske, Thomas, 2020. "Efficient Incentives in Social Networks: Gamification and the Coase Theorem," EconStor Preprints 213805, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Daske, Thomas, 2020. "Efficient Incentives in Social Networks: Gamification and the Coase Theorem," EconStor Preprints 222527, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, revised 2020.
14. Crawford, Vincent P., 2021. "Efficient mechanisms for level-k bilateral trading," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-101.
    • Crawford, Vincent P, 2021. "Efficient mechanisms for level-k bilateral trading," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt4748b7r2, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
15. Wladislaw Mill & John Morgan, 2022. "The cost of a divided America: an experimental study into destructive behavior," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 974-1001, June.
    • Wladislaw Mill & John Morgan, 2020. "The Cost of a Divided America: An Experimental Study Into Destructive Behavior," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_238, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
16. Kassas, Bachir & Palma, Marco A. & Anderson, David P., 2017. "Fine-Tuning Willingness-To-Pay Estimates in Second Price Auctions," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258466, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Kassas, Bachir & Palma, Marco & Ness, Meghan & Anderson, David, 2017. "Fine-Tuning Willingness-To-Pay Estimates in Second Price Auctions," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252793, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
17. Tan, Charmaine H.Y., 2020. "Overbidding and matching rules in second-price auctions: An experimental study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
18. Björn Bartling & Tobias Gesche & Nick Netzer, 2017. "Does the absence of human sellers bias bidding behavior in auction experiments?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 3(1), pages 44-61, July.
    • Björn Bartling & Tobias Gesche & Nick Netzer, 2016. "Does the absence of human sellers bias bidding behavior in auction experiments?," ECON - Working Papers 225, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
19. Ma, Gang & Zheng, Junjun & Wei, Ju & Wang, Shilei & Han, Yefan, 2021. "Robust optimization strategies for seller based on uncertainty sets in context of sequential auction," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
20. Gino Loyola, 2021. "Optimal selling mechanisms with crossholdings," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 25(1), pages 1-32, June.
21. Daske, Thomas, 2017. "Externality Assessments, Welfare Judgments, and Mechanism Design," EconStor Preprints 172494, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
22. Mark T. Le Quement & Amrish Patel, 2018. "Communication as Gift-Exchange," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2018-06, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
23. Mill, Wladislaw & Morgan, John, 2022. "Competition between friends and foes," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    • Wladislaw Mill & John Morgan, 2020. "Competition Between Friends and Foes," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_242, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
24. Kirchkamp, Oliver & Mill, Wladislaw, 2021. "Spite vs. risk: Explaining overbidding in the second-price all-pay auction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 616-635.
25. Choi, Pak-Sing & Espínola-Arredondo, Ana & Muñoz-García, Félix, 2018. "Conservation procurement auctions with bidirectional externalities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 559-579.
26. Chulyoung Kim & Sang-Hyun Kim & Jinhyuk Lee & Jaeok Park, 2023. "Auctions with Externalities: An Experimental Study," Working papers 2023rwp-214, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.