IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/zoedps/1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wider den Wachstumszwang: Institutionelle Auswege aus einem sozialen und ökologischen Dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Barth, Jonathan
  • Richters, Oliver
  • Siemoneit, Andreas

Abstract

Die Bewertung von wirtschaftlichem Wachstum im Rahmen einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaft ist im Netzwerk Nachhaltige Ökonomie umstritten. Die Autoren des vorliegenden Beitrages gehen davon aus, dass ein ökonomischer Wachstumszwang existiert, der vor allem durch die Substitution von Arbeit durch Maschinen und Ressourcenverbrauch entsteht ("technologische Arbeitslosigkeit"). Die höheren Einkommen jener, die von dieser Substitution profitieren, können als ökonomische Renten interpretiert werden. Renten als leistungslose Einkommen untergraben die der Marktwirtschaft zugrundeliegende Gerechtigkeitsnorm, die als Leistungsprinzip bezeichnet wird. Durch die institutionelle Trockenlegung der wichtigsten Quellen leistungsloser Einkommen lässt sich mit wenigen Maßnahmen innerhalb des bestehenden Wirtschaftssystems eine Politik für eine nachhaltigere Ökonomie begründen, die nicht nur einen Weg aus dem Konflikt zwischen Ökonomie, Ökologie und Sozialem weist, sondern zudem im Einklang mit liberalen Grundwerten steht.

Suggested Citation

  • Barth, Jonathan & Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2018. "Wider den Wachstumszwang: Institutionelle Auswege aus einem sozialen und ökologischen Dilemma," ZOE Discussion Papers 1, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:zoedps:1
    Note: Eine geringfügig veränderte Version wurde veröffentlicht in: Holger Rogall et al. (Hrsg.): 6. Jahrbuch Nachhaltige Ökonomie 2018/19, Metropolis, Marburg, 2018. S. 131-43. ISBN 978-3-7316-1339-8. https://www.metropolis-verlag.de/1339/book.do
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/201501/1/zoe-dp-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert U. Ayres & Benjamin Warr, 2009. "The Economic Growth Engine," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13324.
    2. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2017. "Consistency and stability analysis of models of a monetary growth imperative," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 114-125.
    3. Kunkel, Catherine M. & Kammen, Daniel M., 2011. "Design and implementation of carbon cap and dividend policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 477-486, January.
    4. Ottmar Edenhofer & Linus Mattauch & Jan Siegmeier, 2013. "Hypergeorgism: When is Rent Taxation as a Remedy for Insufficient Capital Accumulation Socially Optimal?," CESifo Working Paper Series 4144, CESifo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Wachstumszwang – eine Übersicht," ZOE Discussion Papers 3, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    2. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 126-137.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 126-137.
    2. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2017. "Fear of stagnation? A review on growth imperatives," VÖÖ Discussion Papers 6/2017, Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie e.V. (VÖÖ).
    3. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Marktwirtschaft reparieren: Entwurf einer freiheitlichen, gerechten und nachhaltigen Utopie," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 213814.
    4. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2020. "System change, not climate change? Marktwirtschaft zwischen Utopie und Wachstumszwang," ZOE Discussion Papers 5, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    5. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2021. "Making markets just: Reciprocity violations as key intervention points," ZOE Discussion Papers 7, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    6. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Wachstumszwang – eine Übersicht," ZOE Discussion Papers 3, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    7. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2017. "Wachstumszwänge: Ressourcenverbrauch und Akkumulation als Wettbewerbsverzerrungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 169-182.
    8. Ulrich Witt & Christian Gross, 2020. "The rise of the “service economy” in the second half of the twentieth century and its energetic contingencies," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 231-246, April.
    9. Seyhan, Demet & Weikard, Hans-Peter & van Ierland, Ekko, 2012. "An economic model of long-term phosphorus extraction and recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 103-108.
    10. Florian Fizaine & Victor Court, 2016. "The energy-economic growth relationship: a new insight from the EROI perspective," Working Papers 1601, Chaire Economie du climat.
    11. Brand-Correa, Lina I. & Steinberger, Julia K., 2017. "A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 43-52.
    12. Wang, Feng & Liu, Xiying & Nguyen, Tue Anh, 2018. "Evaluating the economic impacts and feasibility of China's energy cap: Based on an Analytic General Equilibrium Model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 114-126.
    13. Foster, John, 2011. "Energy, aesthetics and knowledge in complex economic systems," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 88-100.
    14. Jacques, Pierre & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Yilmaz, Devrim & Jeanmart, Hervé & Godin, Antoine, 2023. "Assessing the economic consequences of an energy transition through a biophysical stock-flow consistent model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    15. Garcia, Luis Enrique & Illig, Aude & Schindler, Ian, 2018. "Oil Cycle Dynamics and Future Oil Price Scenarios," TSE Working Papers 18-969, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    16. Engler, John-Oliver & Kretschmer, Max-Friedemann & Rathgens, Julius & Ament, Joe A. & Huth, Thomas & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2024. "15 years of degrowth research: A systematic review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    17. Jeroen Bergh, 2011. "Energy Conservation More Effective With Rebound Policy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(1), pages 43-58, January.
    18. Kailin Kroetz & James N. Sanchirico & Daniel K. Lew, 2015. "Efficiency Costs of Social Objectives in Tradable Permit Programs," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(3), pages 339-366.
    19. Tilman Santarius & Johanna Pohl & Steffen Lange, 2020. "Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Henri Safa, 2017. "The Impact of Energy on Global Economy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 287-295.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zoedps:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://zoe-institut.de/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.