IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbisi/spi2009201.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Charakteristika prämierter Forschung in der deutschsprachigen Sozialwissenschaft. Eine Analyse der mit dem Preis der Fritz Thyssen Stiftung ausgezeichneten sozialwissenschaftlichen Aufsätze 1981-2006

Author

Listed:
  • Alber, Jens
  • Fliegner, Florian
  • Nerlich, Torben

Abstract

Der Beitrag fasst zentrale Ergebnisse eines von der Fritz Thyssen Stiftung finanzierten Pilotprojekts über die Auszeichnung sozialwissenschaftlicher deutschsprachiger Zeitschriftenartikel mit dem Fritz Thyssen Preis im Zeitraum 1981 bis 2006 zusammen. Vorrangig geht es um die Klärung von vier Grundfragen: (1) Welches sind die Merkmale prämierter Aufsätze und welche Merkmalverschiebungen ergeben sich im Zeitraum der letzten 25 Jahre? (2) Inwieweit korreliert das Distinktionsmerkmal "Thyssen-Preis" mit anderen Merkmalen der Distinktion von Autoren, die in der Evaluationsforschung Verwendung finden? (3) In welchem Maße konzentriert sich preisgekrönte Forschung auf einige wenige Standorte? (4) Welche Zeitschriften und welche Formen der Sozialwissenschaft schneiden besonders gut ab? Die Analyse konzentriert sich damit auf vier Ebenen, nämlich die Autoren und ihre institutionellen Standorte, die inhaltliche Ausrichtung der prämierten Artikel sowie die Ebene der am Wettbewerb teilnehmenden Zeitschriften. Zu den zentralen Ergebnissen zählt, dass verschiedene Distinktionsmerkmale in den Sozialwissenschaften nur sehr schwach korreliert sind und dass auch preisgekrönte deutsche Sozialforschung international nur schwach sichtbar ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Alber, Jens & Fliegner, Florian & Nerlich, Torben, 2009. "Charakteristika prämierter Forschung in der deutschsprachigen Sozialwissenschaft. Eine Analyse der mit dem Preis der Fritz Thyssen Stiftung ausgezeichneten sozialwissenschaftlichen Aufsätze 1981-2006," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration SP I 2009-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbisi:spi2009201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44142/1/613274024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbertz, Heinrich & Muller-Hill, Benno, 1995. "Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: a bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 959-979, November.
    2. Merkel, Wolfgang, 1994. "Restriktionen und Chancen demokratischer Konsolidierung in postkommunistischen Gesellschaften: Ostmitteleuropa im Vergleich," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(4), pages 463-484.
    3. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2001. "The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(2), pages 291-314, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Álvarez-García & Amador Durán-Sánchez & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & María de la Cruz del Río-Rama, 2023. "Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting (SJFA): Mapping of Knowledge over the Last 25 Years," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Jeong, Yujin & Park, Inchae & Yoon, Byungun, 2019. "Identifying emerging Research and Business Development (R&BD) areas based on topic modeling and visualization with intellectual property right data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 655-672.
    3. Henk F. Moed, 2000. "Bibliometric Indicators Reflect Publication and Management Strategies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(2), pages 323-346, February.
    4. Gregorio González-Alcaide, 2021. "Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6837-6870, August.
    5. Ying Guo & Xiantao Xiao, 2022. "Author-level altmetrics for the evaluation of Chinese scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(2), pages 973-990, February.
    6. Ali Najmi & Taha H. Rashidi & Alireza Abbasi & S. Travis Waller, 2017. "Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 843-865, February.
    7. Yuxue Yang & Xuejiao Tan & Yafei Shi & Jun Deng, 2023. "What are the core concerns of policy analysis? A multidisciplinary investigation based on in-depth bibliometric analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Zhigao Liu & Yimei Yin & Weidong Liu & Michael Dunford, 2015. "Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 135-158, April.
    9. Byoungsam Jin & Youngchul Bae, 2023. "Prospective Research Trend Analysis on Zero-Energy Building (ZEB): An Artificial Intelligence Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Bhavna Thawani & Tushar Panigrahi & Meena Bhatia, 2024. "Eleven years of integrated reporting: a bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 666-684, December.
    11. Hürlimann, Werner, 2015. "On the uniform random upper bound family of first significant digit distributions," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 349-358.
    12. Wynne E. Norton & Alina Lungeanu & David A. Chambers & Noshir Contractor, 2017. "Mapping the growing discipline of dissemination and implementation science in health," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1367-1390, September.
    13. Md. Nazmus Sakib & Shah Ridwan Chowdhury & Mohammad Younus & Nehad Laila Sanju & Farhana Foysal Satata & Mahafuza Islam, 2024. "How HR analytics evolved over time: a bibliometric analysis on Scopus database," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Ana Teresa Tavares-Lehmann & Celeste Varum, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Zahed Bigdeli & Ali Gazni, 2012. "Authors’ sources of information: a new dimension in information scattering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 505-521, September.
    16. Siyan Zeng & Jing Ma & Yanhua Ren & Gang-Jun Liu & Qi Zhang & Fu Chen, 2019. "Assessing the Spatial Distribution of Soil PAHs and their Relationship with Anthropogenic Activities at a National Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    17. İsmail Dönmez, 2024. "Sustainability in Educational Research: Mapping the Field with a Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Arturas Kaklauskas & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Natalija Lepkova & Saulius Raslanas & Kestutis Dauksys & Ingrida Vetloviene & Ieva Ubarte, 2021. "Sustainable Construction Investment, Real Estate Development, and COVID-19: A Review of Literature in the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-42, July.
    19. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    20. Yin, Xicheng & Wang, Hongwei & Wang, Wei & Zhu, Kevin, 2020. "Task recommendation in crowdsourcing systems: A bibliometric analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbisi:spi2009201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uswzbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.