IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbisc/fsiii99203.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Soziale Integration und politische Institutionen in modernen Gesellschaften

Author

Listed:
  • Fuchs, Dieter

Abstract

Im Unterschied zu zeitgenössischen Diagnosen über den Zustand moderner Gesellschaften, geht die Analyse davon aus, daß die These der Desintegration dieser Gesellschaften empirisch völlig ungeklärt ist. Zur Durchführung von systematischen und empirischen Studien sind allererst begrifflich-theoretische Vorarbeiten nötig, zu denen die Analyse beitragen will. Es werden drei Ziele verfolgt: Erstens eine genaue Bestimmung des Begriffs der sozialen Integration. Dazu werden sechs operationale Definitionen vorgeschlagen, die sich unter anderem im Grad ihres normativen Anspruchs unterscheiden. Zweitens eine genaue Bestimmung des Begriffs der politischen Institutionen und drittens die Spezifikation eines empirisch testbaren liberalen Modells der sozialen Integration. In diesem Modell spielt die Unterstützung des politischen Institutionengefüges eines Landes eine zentrale Rolle. Die Konstruktion des Modells orientiert sich an der grundlegenden Unterscheidung eines politischen Systems in drei hierarchisch angeordnete Ebenen ' der Kultur-, Struktur- und Prozeßebene ' und konkretisiert diese Ebenen in Anlehnung an die liberale Demokratietheorie durch die Spezifikation von empirisch meßbaren Konstrukten und Zusammenhängen zwischen diesen Konstrukten.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuchs, Dieter, 1999. "Soziale Integration und politische Institutionen in modernen Gesellschaften," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 99-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbisc:fsiii99203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/48998/1/303845678.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ostrom, Elinor, 1991. "Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: Toward Complementarity," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(1), pages 237-243, March.
    2. Crawford, Sue E. S. & Ostrom, Elinor, 1995. "A Grammar of Institutions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(3), pages 582-600, September.
    3. Welzel, Christian & Inglehart, Ronald, 1999. "Analyzing democratic change and stability: A human development theory of democracy," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 99-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Shugart,Matthew Soberg & Carey,John M., 1992. "Presidents and Assemblies," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521429900, October.
    5. Shugart,Matthew Soberg & Carey,John M., 1992. "Presidents and Assemblies," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521419628, October.
    6. Tsebelis, George, 1995. "Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 289-325, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fuchs, Dieter, 2001. "Types and indices of democratic regimes," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 01-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    3. Fuchs, Dieter, 2000. "Typen und Indizes demokratischer Regime: Eine Analyse des Präsidentialismus- und des Veto-Spieler-Ansatzes," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 00-205, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Fuchs, Dieter, 2002. "Das Demokratiedefizit der Europäischen Union und die politische Integration Europas: Eine Analyse der Einstellungen der Bürger in Westeuropa," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 02-204, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    5. Fuchs, Dieter, 1999. "Die demokratische Gemeinschaft in den USA und in Deutschland," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 99-204, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo T. Spiller, 2003. "The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transactions Approach with Application to Argentina," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 281-306, October.
    2. André Kaiser, 1997. "Types of Democracy," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 9(4), pages 419-444, October.
    3. Carlos Scartascini & Mariano Tommasi & Ernesto Stein, 2010. "Veto Players and Policy Trade-Offs- An Intertemporal Approach to Study the Effects of Political Institutions on Policy," Research Department Publications 4660, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    4. Carlos Scartascini & Mariano Tommasi & Ernesto H. Stein, 2008. "Veto Players, Intertemporal Interactions and Policy Adaptability: How Do Political Institutions Work?," Research Department Publications 4593, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    5. Mariano Tommasi & Pablo T. Spiller & Ernesto Stein, 2003. "Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes. An Intertemporal Transactions Framework," Working Papers 59, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Jul 2003.
    6. Marcelin, Isaac & Stephen, Sheryl-Ann K. & Fanta, Fassil & Tecklezion, Mussie, 2019. "Political regimes, investment and electoral uncertainty," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 580-599.
    7. Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen & Dominique Oehrli & Adrian Vatter, 2021. "Do governments delay the implementation of parliamentary requests? Examining time variation in implementing legislative requests in Switzerland," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 663-690, September.
    8. B. Heller, William & P. Kyriacou, Andreas & Roca-Sagalés, Oriol, 2014. "Legislative Vetoes and Corruption: The Effect of Formal Checks on Governance," MPRA Paper 61651, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Mariano Tommasi & Carlos Scartascini & Ernesto Stein, 2014. "Veto players and policy adaptability: An intertemporal perspective," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 222-248, April.
    10. Mariano Tommasi & Pablo T. Spiller, 2004. "The Institutions of Regulation," Working Papers 67, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Mar 2004.
    11. Mícheál O’Keeffe & Alessio Terzi, 2015. "The political economy of financial crisis policy," Working Papers 888, Bruegel.
    12. Carlos Scartascini & Mariano Tommasi & Ernesto H. Stein, 2008. "Un Enfoque Intertemporal Interactions and Policy Adaptability: How Do Political Institutions Work?," Research Department Publications 4594, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    13. Toke Aidt & Francesco Giovannoni, 2011. "Critical decisions and constitutional rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(2), pages 219-268, July.
    14. Josep M. Colomer, 2005. "Policy making in divided government. A pivotal actors model with party discipline," Economics Working Papers 817, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    15. Torsten Persson & Guido Tabellini, 2004. "Constitutions and Economic Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(1), pages 75-98, Winter.
    16. Thomas H. Hammond & Christopher K. Butler, 2003. "Some Complex Answers to the Simple Question ‘Do Institutions Matter?’," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 15(2), pages 145-200, April.
    17. Cingolani, Luciana & Crombrugghe, Denis de, 2012. "Exploring the panel components of the Institutional Profiles Database (IPD)," MERIT Working Papers 2012-037, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    18. Fuchs, Dieter, 2001. "Types and indices of democratic regimes," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 01-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    19. Josep Colomer, 2005. "Policy making in divided government: A pivotal actors model with party discipline," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 247-269, December.
    20. Cusack, Thomas R., 1997. "Social capital, institutional structures, and democratic performance: A comparative study of German local governments," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 97-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbisc:fsiii99203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.