IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbipo/p99307.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Political boundary making toward Poland: Social identities and interest-formation in German elite reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Ecker, Matthias

Abstract

Using data from the ‘German-Polish Elite Study’, the paper presents findings as to how the German ‘positional elite’ thinks about the changing political significance of the border between Germans and Poles. Three dimensions of current ‘political boundary making’ are considered: Restrictions on cross-border traffic at Oder and Neisse and the two enlargements of the European Union and NATO respectively. As can be shown, while ‘transnational’ identity ties between German and Polish elite members foster support for political integration, national identification is in some ways still an obstacle to ‘de-bordering’. Nevertheless, interests – although themselves depending on social identities – are still (more) important variables for understanding how boundaries are drawn. With respect to enlargements, the German elites support a reduction in the political signifi-cance of the German-Polish border; albeit more in terms of a European ‘society’ based on functional regimes like EU and NATO than a European ‘community’ in the sociological meaning. With respect to controls: while borders may vanish as military ‘hard shells’ (John Herz), the German-Polish state border is still seen as a necessary instrument against crime, although with the ‘odour of a lost battle’ in terms of efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ecker, Matthias, 1999. "Political boundary making toward Poland: Social identities and interest-formation in German elite reasoning," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 99-307, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbipo:p99307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49844/1/338692495.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendt, Alexander, 1994. "Collective Identity Formation and the International State," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 88(2), pages 384-396, June.
    2. Wendt, Alexander, 1992. "Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 391-425, April.
    3. Ruggie, John Gerard, 1993. "Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 139-174, January.
    4. Buzan, Barry, 1993. "From international system to international society: structural realism and regime theory meet the English school," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 327-352, July.
    5. March, James G. & Olsen, Johan P., 1998. "The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 943-969, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javier Leonardo Garay Vargas & Juan Bautista Pavajeau, 2021. "Ideas erradas, acciones equivocadas : cómo el contexto internacional impide la generación de desarrollo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, number 151.
    2. Tanja E. Aalberts, 2005. "Sovereignty Reloaded? A Constructivist Perspective on European Research," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0010, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    3. Remi Maier-Rigaud, 2008. "International Organizations as Corporate Actors: Agency and Emergence in Theories of International Relations," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_07, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    4. Leuze, Kathrin & Brand, Tilman & Jakobi, Anja P. & Martens, Kerstin & Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth, 2008. "Analysing the two-level game: international and national determinants of change in education policy making," TranState Working Papers 72, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    5. Păduraru Mihail, 2021. "Constructivism and competitive intelligence, new economic model during Covid-19 crisis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1027-1041, December.
    6. David Lake, 2007. "Delegating divisible sovereignty: Sweeping a conceptual minefield," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 219-237, September.
    7. Shibashis Chatterjee, 2005. "Ethnic Conflicts in South Asia," South Asian Survey, , vol. 12(1), pages 75-89, March.
    8. Rachel Epstein, 2003. "The Internationalization of Finance and Defense in Postcommunist Poland," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 2, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    9. Benjamin Zyla, 2018. "Beyond the 2% fetishism: studying the practice of collective action in transatlantic affairs," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Pattharapong Rattanasevee, 2023. "Understanding and Prospect of Identity Construction in ASEAN Integration," International Studies, , vol. 60(4), pages 379-400, October.
    11. Steininger, Lea & Hesse, Casimir, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 357, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    12. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 191-219, March.
    13. Ines Wagner, 2015. "The Political Economy of Borders in a 'Borderless' European Labour Market," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1370-1385, November.
    14. Harald Schoen, 2008. "Identity, Instrumental Self-Interest and Institutional Evaluations," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(1), pages 5-29, March.
    15. Clayton L. Thyne, 2006. "Cheap Signals with Costly Consequences," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(6), pages 937-961, December.
    16. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8529 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Joyeeta Gupta & Aarti Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2022. "Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 393-409, June.
    18. Sandberg, Kristin Ingstad & Andresen, Steinar & Bjune, Gunnar, 2010. "A new approach to global health institutions? A case study of new vaccine introduction and the formation of the GAVI Alliance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1349-1356, October.
    19. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    20. Valeriu DECIU, 2018. "Eu Citizenship And Identity," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 5, pages 9-26.
    21. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01019642, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbipo:p99307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.