IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbint/spiii2006202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fluch oder Segen? Hedge-Fonds in Deutschland. Ein Beirag zur Versachlichung der Debatte

Author

Listed:
  • Bahn, Christopher

Abstract

Private Equity und Hedge Fonds nach englischem und amerikanischem Modell drängen immer mehr auf die deutschen Finanzmärkte. Die Auswirkung von Hedge Fonds auf die Funktionsweise der deutschen Finanzmärkte und eine zunehmende Verflechtung zwischen deutschen und angelsächsischen Finanzakteuren sind im Allgemeinen positiv zu bewerten. Sie beanspruchen jedoch auch ein Regulierungssystem mindestens auf europäischer, wenn nicht auf globaler Ebene.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahn, Christopher, 2006. "Fluch oder Segen? Hedge-Fonds in Deutschland. Ein Beirag zur Versachlichung der Debatte," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Internationalization and Organization SP III 2006-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbint:spiii2006202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/48954/1/525309063.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mr. Barry J. Eichengreen & Mr. Donald J Mathieson, 1999. "Hedge Funds: What Do We Really Know?," IMF Economic Issues 1999/002, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Hall, Peter A. & Soskice, David (ed.), 2001. "Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199247752, Decembrie.
    3. Barry J. Eichengreen & Donald J Mathieson, 1999. "Hedge Funds; What Do We Really Know?," IMF Economic Issues 19, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giancarlo Corsetti & Paolo Pesenti & Nouriel Roubini, 2002. "The Role of Large Players in Currency Crises," NBER Chapters, in: Preventing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets, pages 197-268, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Danielsson, Jon & Taylor, Ashley & Zigrand, Jean-Pierre, 2005. "Highwaymen or heroes: Should hedge funds be regulated?: A survey," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 522-543, October.
    3. Benton E. Gup (ed.), 2010. "The Financial and Economic Crises," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13642, December.
    4. Petr Musílek & Tomáš Jeřábek, 2015. "Hedgeové fondy a akciové trhy [Hedge Funds and Stock Markets]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 91-107.
    5. Navin Beekarry, 2010. "Hedge Funds and Offshore Financial Centers: New Challenges for the Regulation of Systemic Risks," Chapters, in: Benton E. Gup (ed.), The Financial and Economic Crises, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. El Kalak, Izidin & Azevedo, Alcino & Hudson, Robert, 2016. "Reviewing the hedge funds literature II: Hedge funds' returns and risk management characteristics," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 55-66.
    7. Niels Bosma & Sander Wennekers & F. Stam, 2010. "Intrapreneurship - An international study," Scales Research Reports H201005, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    8. Ronald Schettkat & Rongrong Sun, 2009. "Monetary policy and European unemployment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 94-108, Spring.
    9. Dorward, Andrew & Kydd, Jonathan & Poulton, Colin, 2004. "Market and Coordination Failures in Poor Rural Economies: Policy Implications for Agricultural and Rural Development," 2004 Inaugural Symposium, December 6-8, 2004, Nairobi, Kenya 9535, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    10. Mazumdar, Surajit, 2010. "Indian Capitalism: A Case that doesn’t Fit?," MPRA Paper 28162, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Geoffrey Schneider, 2008. "Comparative Institutional Advantage and the Appropriate Development Model for Sub-Saharan Africa," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 115-124, January.
    12. Patrick Hamm & David Stuckler & Lawrence King, 2006. "Mass Privatization and the Postcommunist Mortality Crisis," Working Papers wp118, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    13. Matthieu MONTALBAN (, 2009. "How financialisation shapes productive models in pharmaceutical industry: the domination and contradictions of the blockbuster conception of control (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2009-01, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    14. Eyüp Özveren & Utku Havuç & Emrah Karaoğuz, 2012. "From Stages to Varieties of Capitalism: Lessons, Limits and Prospects," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 59(1), pages 13-36, March.
    15. Vitols, Sigurt, 2004. "Changes in Germany's bank-based financial system: A varieties of capitalism perspective," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions, States, Markets SP II 2004-03, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Rabia Naguib & Joseph Smucker, 2009. "When Economic Growth Rhymes with Social Development: The Malaysia Experience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 99-113, November.
    17. Stefano Sacchi & Federico Pancaldi & Claudia Arisi, 2011. "The Economic Crisis as a Trigger of Convergence? Short-time work in Italy, Germany and Austria," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 199, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    18. Johan Bo Davidsson, 2011. "An Analytical Overview of Labour Market Reforms Across the EU: Making Sense of the Variation," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 111, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.
    19. Frederick Guy & Peter Skott, 2008. "Power, Productivity, and Profits," Springer Books, in: Matthew Braham & Frank Steffen (ed.), Power, Freedom, and Voting, chapter 20, pages 385-403, Springer.
    20. Betzelt, Sigrid, 2007. "Gender Regimes: ein ertragreiches Konzept für die komparative Forschung; Literaturstudie," Working papers of the ZeS 12/2007, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbint:spiii2006202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.