IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbdsc/spv2018102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The politics of violence and populism in post-colonial democracy: The role of political society in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Koelble, Thomas A.

Abstract

This paper argues that current levels of violence and populism in post-colonial spaces such as South Africa are a consequence of a socio-history of violent dispossession, exploitation and impoverishment and is perpetuated by the continuation of the socio-economic and political conditions rooted in that history of exceptional violence, inequality and injustice. A switch in the political system does not reduce violence by itself. The disposition towards violence can only be shifted by a fundamental shift away from the economics and politics of the apartheid era. Since such a shift is unlikely to occur under current conditions, the perpetuation of violence and populist politics are likely to remain key features and consti-tutive elements of post-apartheid democracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Koelble, Thomas A., 2018. "The politics of violence and populism in post-colonial democracy: The role of political society in South Africa," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Democracy and Democratization SP V 2018-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbdsc:spv2018102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/190802/1/1043362177.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vivek Swaroop Sharma, 2015. "Kinship, Property, and Authority," Politics & Society, , vol. 43(2), pages 151-180, June.
    2. Michael Levien, 2013. "The Politics of Dispossession," Politics & Society, , vol. 41(3), pages 351-394, September.
    3. Marcel Paret, 2015. "Violence and democracy in South Africa's community protests," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(143), pages 107-123, March.
    4. Deborah Boucoyannis, 2015. "No Taxation of Elites, No Representation," Politics & Society, , vol. 43(3), pages 303-332, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levien, Michael, 2015. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land, Norms, and Trust in Rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-92.
    2. Temper, Leah & Martinez-Alier, Joan, 2013. "The god of the mountain and Godavarman: Net Present Value, indigenous territorial rights and sacredness in a bauxite mining conflict in India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 79-87.
    3. Xuefei Ren, 2017. "Land acquisition, rural protests, and the local state in China and India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 25-41, February.
    4. Manuel Rosaldo, 2022. "The Antinomies of Successful Mobilization: Colombian Recyclers Manoeuvre between Dispossession and Exploitation," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(2), pages 251-278, March.
    5. Sarah Day & Mohamed Seedat & Josephine Cornell & Shahnaaz Suffla, 2019. "A multimodal reading of public protests," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(6), pages 1005-1023, September.
    6. Alkon, Meir, 2018. "Do special economic zones induce developmental spillovers? Evidence from India’s states," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 396-409.
    7. Karita Kan, 2020. "The social politics of dispossession: Informal institutions and land expropriation in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3331-3346, December.
    8. Manjusha Nair, 2020. "Land as a Transactional Asset: Moral Economy and Market Logic in Contested Land Acquisition in India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(6), pages 1511-1532, November.
    9. Asabu Sewenet Alamineh & Getachew Fentahun Workie & Nurlign Birhan Moges, 2021. "The political-economy of land acquisition and privatization of Birr and Ayehu Farms in Amhara Region, North-West Ethiopia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Rea, Christopher, 2016. "Theorizing command-and-commodify regulation: the case of species conservation banking in the United States," SocArXiv f6ux4, Center for Open Science.
    11. David Mosse & Sundara Babu Nagappan, 2021. "NGOs as Social Movements: Policy Narratives, Networks and the Performance of Dalit Rights in South India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 134-167, January.
    12. Julien Mercille & Enda Murphy, 2017. "What is privatization? A political economy framework," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 1040-1059, May.
    13. A. L. Ashni & R. Santhosh, 2019. "Catholic Church, Fishers and Negotiating Development: A Study on the Vizhinjam Port Project," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 24(2), pages 187-204, December.
    14. Thomas Cowan, 2021. "UNCERTAIN GROUNDS: Cartographic Negotiation and Digitized Property on the Urban Frontier," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 442-457, May.
    15. Karita Kan, 2019. "Accumulation without Dispossession? Land Commodification and Rent Extraction in Peri‐urban China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 633-648, July.
    16. Kenneth Bo Nielsen & Heather Plumridge Bedi, 2017. "The regional identity politics of India’s new land wars: Land, food, and popular mobilisation in Goa and West Bengal," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2324-2341, October.
    17. Michael Levien, 2014. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land,Norms, and Trust in Rural India," IEG Working Papers 341, Institute of Economic Growth.
    18. Aditya Ray, 2020. "IT-Oriented Infrastructural Development, Urban Co-Dependencies, and the Reconfiguration of Everyday Politics in Pune, India," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 371-383.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbdsc:spv2018102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.