Author
Abstract
In this paper the results of an analysis of the material intensity of advanced composite materialsare presented. The analysis is based on the MIPS-concept of the Wuppertal Institute whichallows the calculation of the overall material intensity of products and services. It can be shownthat the production of one kg of E-Glass fibers is connected with the consumption of 6.2 kgmaterials, 95 kg water and 2.1 kg oxygen which is of similar size compared to the inputsrequired in steel production. Material inputs required to produce one kg of p-aramid are 37 kg ofmaterials and 19.6 kg air. Values for carbon fibers are even higher yielding to 61.1 kg of abioticmaterials and 33.1 kg of air. Similarly, the production of epoxy resins is connected with largermaterial flows than the production of polyester resins. Of core materials, inputs per kg for PVC-foam exceed those in PUR-foam production by a factor of 1.4 in water to 2.3 in abiotic materialconsumption.However, ecologically decisive are not the inputs per kg but the material input per service unit.Therefore, the material input per service unit computed for the body of a passenger ship and arobot arm are compared with alternative steel and aluminium versions. Both examples show thatin the case of significant inputs during the user phase of products, even a more materialintensive investment in the production phase can yield significant ecological benefits over thewhole life-cycle compared to metal versions. Improvements can easily reach a factor of twoalbeit significant potential for engine optimizations have still been neglected.Results already include the actual recycling quota of metals whereas for composites only virginmaterial has been calculated as any form of real recycling does not actually exist but only certaintypes of downrecycling. Of those treatment options, first material recycling and second the usein blast furnaces would lead to better results in resource productivity than incineration andlandfills.The paper finally draws some conclusions about the potential advantages of material substitutionin the automotive industry. Due to the rather short real operation time of cars during their userphase - around six months - an investment in advanced composite materials in car productiononly results in a significant improvement of the overall eco-efficiency of cars if it allows asubstantial weight reduction of the overall vehicle.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wuppap:90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wikuede.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.