IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wtowps/ersd201009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International regulation and treatment of trade finance: What are the issues?

Author

Listed:
  • Auboin, Marc

Abstract

The paper discusses a number of issues related to the treatment of trade credit internationally, a priori (treatment by banking regulators) and a posteriori (treatment by debtors and creditors in the case of default), which are currently of interest to the trade finance community, in particular the traditional providers of trade credit and guarantees, such as banks, export credit agencies, regional development banks, and multilateral agencies. The paper does not deal with the specific issue of regulation of official insured-export credit, under the OECD Arrangement, which is a specific matter left out of this analysis. Traditionally, trade finance has received preferred treatment on the part of national and international regulators, as well as by international financial agencies in the treatment of trade finance claims, on grounds that trade finance was one of the safest, most collateralized, and self-liquidating forms of trade finance. Preferred treatment of trade finance also reflects the systemic importance of trade, as in sovereign or private defaults a priority is to treat expeditiously trade lines of credits to allow for such credit to be restored and trade to flow again. It is not only a matter of urgency for essential imports to be financed, but also a pre-condition for economic recovery, as the resumption of trade is necessary for ailing countries to restore balance of payments equilibrium. The relatively favourable treatment received by trade finance was reflected in the moderate rate of capitalization for cross-border trade credit in the form of letters of credit and similar securitized instruments under the Basel I regulatory framework, put in place in the late 1980s and early 1990s. However, as the banking and regulatory communities moved towards internal-rating based and risk-weighted assets systems under the successor Basel II framework, a number of complaints emerged with respect to the treatment of trade credit particularly in periods of crisis. Issues of pro-cyclicality, maturity structure and country risk have been discussed at some length in various fora, including in the WTO at the initiative of Members. Part of the issue was that Basel II regulation was designed and implemented in a manner that, in periods of banking retrenchment, seemed to have affected the supply of trade credit more than other potentially more risky forms of lending. With the collapse of trade in late 2008 and early 2009, the regulatory treatment of trade credit under Basel II clearly became an issue and was discussed by professional banking organizations, regulators and international financial institutions. A sentence made its headway into the communiqué of G-20 Leaders in London in April 2009, calling upon regulators to exercise some flexibility in the application of Basel II rules, in support of trade finance. As the issue of removing the obstacles to the supply of trade finance spread became part of the public debate, discussions with respect to the regulatory treatment of trade finance in the context of the making of Basel III rules are now raising political attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Auboin, Marc, 2010. "International regulation and treatment of trade finance: What are the issues?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2010-09, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wtowps:ersd201009
    DOI: 10.30875/9d04ba4c-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/57601/1/63999640X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30875/9d04ba4c-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Auboin, Marc, 2007. "Boosting trade finance in developing countries: What link with the WTO?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2007-04, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Auboin & Isabella Blengini, 2014. "The Impact of Basel III on Trade Finance: The Potential Unintended Consequences of the Leverage Ratio," CESifo Working Paper Series 4953, CESifo.
    2. Auboin, Marc & Blengini, Isabella, 2014. "The impact of Basel III on trade finance: The potential unintended consequences of the leverage ratio," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2014-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    3. Marc Auboin, 2014. "Facilitating the Access of Trade Finance to Traders: The Role of the WTO," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 15(03), pages 12-16, August.
    4. BAICU, Claudia Gabriela, 2011. "The Regulatory Framework Of Trade Finance: From Basel I To Basel Ii," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 2(3), pages 39-50.
    5. Marc Auboin & Isabella Blengini, 2019. "The impact of Basel III on trade finance: the potential unintended consequences of the leverage ratio," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 115-123, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikhil Patel, 2021. "International Trade Finance and the Cost Channel of Monetary Policy in Open Economies," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 17(70), pages 1-62, October.
    2. Koopmann, Georg & Hoekstra, Ruth, 2010. "Aid for trade and the political economy of trade liberalization," HWWI Research Papers 2-22, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    3. Türkcan Kemal & Avsar Veysel, 2016. "Investigating the Role of Contract Enforcement and Financial Costs on the Payment Choice: Industry-Level Evidence from Turkey," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 135-160, March.
    4. Schmidt-Eisenlohr, Tim, 2013. "Towards a theory of trade finance," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 96-112.
    5. Mary Amiti & David E. Weinstein, 2011. "Exports and Financial Shocks," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 126(4), pages 1841-1877.
    6. Nuetah, J. Alexander & Xin, Xian & Zuo, Ting, 2010. "Does Trade Liberalization Make the Poor Better Off? Sub-Saharan Africa and the Doha Agricultural Trade Reform," Conference papers 331991, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Auboin, Marc, 2009. "Restoring trade finance during a period of financial crisis: Stocktaking of recent initiatives," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2009-16, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    8. Zheng, J., 2012. "Essays on pensions, health expectancy and credit insurance," Other publications TiSEM 922b794a-7d11-4463-9843-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. López, Dorotea & Muñoz, Felipe, 2021. "Trade finance constrains as a barrier for Chilean services internationalization," TEC Empresarial, School of Business, Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), vol. 15(1), pages 2-19.
    10. Kemal Turkcan, 2016. "Evolving Patterns of Payment Methods in Turkish Foreign Trade," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 3-29, June.
    11. Feng, Ling & Li, Zhiyuan & Swenson, Deborah L., 2016. "The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 86-101.
    12. Nikhil Patel, 2016. "International Trade Finance and the Cost Channel of Monetary Policy in Open Economies," BIS Working Papers 539, Bank for International Settlements.
    13. Goldbach, Stefan & Nitsch, Volker, 2015. "Cutting the credit line: Evidence from Germany," Discussion Papers 25/2015, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    14. Nitsch, Volker & Goldbach, Stefan, 2014. "Bank Credit and Trade: Evidence from Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100534, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    15. Zericho R. Marak & Deepa Pillai, 2021. "Relationship Between International Factoring and Cross-border Trade: A Granger Causality Approach," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 15(3), pages 320-337, August.
    16. Md Deluair Hossen, 2023. "Financing Costs, Per-Shipment Costs and Shipping Frequency: Firm-Level Evidence from Bangladesh," Papers 2303.04223, arXiv.org.
    17. Gabriel Felbermayr & Inga Heiland & Erdal Yalcin & Gabriel J. Felbermayr, 2012. "Mitigating Liquidity Constraints: Public Export Credit Guarantees in Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 3908, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trade financing; cooperation with international financial institutions; coherence; G-20; financial crisis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems
    • F36 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wtowps:ersd201009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wtoerch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.