IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/uhhafs/21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das Ende der neoklassischen Orthodoxie? Oder: Wieso ein methodischer Pluralismus gut täte

Author

Listed:
  • Heise, Arne

Abstract

Das neoklassische Paradigma einer Markt- bzw. Tauschwirtschaft stellt zweifellos die ,Normalwissenschaft' in der Ökonomie dar, der sich gerade auch in Deutschland der ganz überwiegende Teil der forschungsintensiven und politikberatenden Wirtschaftswissenschaftler verschrieben haben. In den USA wird die Kritik an den grundlegenden Annahmen und den daraus ableitbaren wirtschaftspolitischen Maßnahmen von prominenter Seite zunehmend lauter. In diesem Artikel wird die neoklassische Normalwissenschaft anhand der Axiome ihres ,Kerns und der zusätzlichen Annahmen ihres ,schützenden Gürtels' beschrieben und die Kritik an den impliziten Postulaten herausgearbeitet. Außerdem wird beschrieben, dass die deutsche akademische Ökonomie auf den sich anbahnenden Paradigmenwechsel schlecht vorbereitet scheint und eine größere Methoden- und Modellpluralität dringend nötig ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Heise, Arne, 2007. "Das Ende der neoklassischen Orthodoxie? Oder: Wieso ein methodischer Pluralismus gut täte," Working Papers on Economic Governance 21, University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:uhhafs:21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/27089/1/527781983.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:zbw:inwedp:552014 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Heise, Arne & Thieme, Sebastian, 2017. "University Governance and Heterodox Economis: Mapping an Academic Field of Power in Germany," MPRA Paper 92485, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Martin Kniepert, 2014. "Die (Neue) Institutionenökonomik als Ansatz für einen erweiterten, offeneren Zugang zur Volkswirtschaftslehre," Working Papers 552014, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:uhhafs:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dwuhhde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.