IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ufzdps/22001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Welchen Beitrag können die Wirtschaftswissenschaften zum Erhalt der Biodiversität leisten?

Author

Listed:
  • Klauer, Bernd

Abstract

In der politischen Diskussion werden für den Erhalt der biologischen Vielfalt in der Regel ökonomische Argumente vorgebracht: Biodiversität sollte als ökonomisches Gut betrachtet werden. Dem Rückgang der Vielfalt sei entgegenzutreten, indem man die Auswirkungen menschlicher Aktivitäten auf die Biodiversität mit dem ökonomisch angemessenen Preis bewertet und bei Entscheidungen entsprechend berücksichtigt. In diesem Beitrag wird gezeigt, dass diese Argumentation zu kurz greift. Ökonomische Bewertungen fußen letztlich auf dem Marginalprinzip. Die Bedeutung der Biodiversität (und der natürlichen Umwelt) wird dabei systematisch unterschätzt. Alfred Marshall erkannte als erster, dass der Preis eines Gutes seine Knappheit und nicht seine Bedeutung misst. Erst bei hoher Knappheit der Biodiversität, spiegelt der Preis auch seine Bedeutung wider. Aufgrund der Irreversibilität des Biodiversitätsverlustes sollte man aber nicht so lange warten. Meine These lautet, dass die Ökonomik durch die Ermittlung des (marginalen) Preises der Biodiversität, des ökonomischen Gesamtwertes der Biodiversität oder des Gesamtwertes aller Ökosystemdienstleistungen nur einen geringen Beitrag zur Lösung des Problems Erhalt der Biodiversität leisten kann. Die Entscheidung für den Erhalt muss eine politische Rahmenvorgabe sein. Sie muss vor allem ökologisch-naturwissenschaftlich und ethisch begründet werden. Wurde aber eine solche Grundsatzentscheidung (z.B. über safe minimum standards) bereits getroffen, können die Wirtschaftswissenschaften (in interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit) einen wesentlichen Beitrag zu der Frage leisten, wie ein solches Ziel am besten erreicht werden kann. Vor allem können geeignete ökonomische Anreizstrukturen geschaffen werden, um die gesetzten Erhaltungsziele zu realisieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Klauer, Bernd, 2001. "Welchen Beitrag können die Wirtschaftswissenschaften zum Erhalt der Biodiversität leisten?," UFZ Discussion Papers 2/2001, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:22001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/45219/1/330060635.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daly, Herman E., 1992. "Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 185-193, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davis, Carlton George & Langham, Max R., 1995. "Agricultural Industrialization And Sustainable Development: A Global Perspective," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(01), pages 1-14, July.
    2. repec:ipg:wpaper:13 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Teixidó Figueras, Jordi & Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio, 2012. "Ecological Footprint Inequality: A methodological review and some results," Working Papers 2072/203168, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    4. Tom Thomas & Eric Lamm, 2012. "Legitimacy and Organizational Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 191-203, October.
    5. Osberg, Gustav & Schulz, Felix & Bretter, Christian, 2024. "Navigating sustainable futures: The role of terminal and instrumental values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Gibson, Clark C. & Ostrom, Elinor & Ahn, T. K., 2000. "The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 217-239, February.
    7. Costanza, Robert & d'Arge, Ralph & de Groot, Rudolf & Farber, Stephen & Grasso, Monica & Hannon, Bruce & Limburg, Karin & Naeem, Shahid & O'Neill, Robert V. & Paruelo, Jose, 1998. "The value of ecosystem services: putting the issues in perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 67-72, April.
    8. Rennings, Klaus & Koschel, Henrike, 1995. "Externe Kosten der Energieversorgung und ihre Bedeutung im Konzept einer dauerhaft-umweltgerechten Entwicklung," ZEW Dokumentationen 95-06, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Davis, Carlton G. & Langham, Max R., 1995. "Agricultural Indistrialization and Sustainable Development: A Global Perspective," International Working Paper Series 237431, University of Florida, Food and Resource Economics Department.
    10. White, Thomas J., 2007. "Sharing resources: The global distribution of the Ecological Footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 402-410, December.
    11. Michael B. Wironen & Robert V. Bartlett & Jon D. Erickson, 2019. "Deliberation and the Promise of a Deeply Democratic Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Farley, Joshua & Melgar, Rigo E.M. & Hasan Ansari, Danish & Burke, Matthew J. & Danielsen, Julia & Egler, Megan & Makombore, Lizah & Neira, Juliana & Poudel, Shashank & Sellers, Shaun & Smolyar, Nina , 2024. "Rethinking ecosystem services from the anthropocene to the Ecozoic: Nature’s benefits to the biotic community," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Aniqa Ahmad & Sofia Anwar, 2023. "A Composite Index for Sustainable Development: Measurement and Development Status of Selected Countries," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14.
    14. Jordan, Geraldine J. & Fortin, Marie-Josee, 2002. "Scale and topology in the ecological economics sustainability paradigm," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 361-366, May.
    15. Rennings, Klaus & Koschel, Henrike & Brockmann, Karl Ludwig & Kuhn, Isabel, 1999. "A regulatory framework for a policy of sustainability: lessons from the neo-liberal school," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 197-212, February.
    16. Ferng, Jiun-Jiun, 2007. "Biophysical assessments in evaluating industrial development: An experience from Taiwan freshwater aquaculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 427-434, August.
    17. Kohn, Jorg, 1998. "Thinking in terms of system hierarchies and velocities. What makes development sustainable?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 173-187, August.
    18. Remig, Moritz C., 2017. "Structured pluralism in ecological economics — A reply to Peter Söderbaum's commentary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 533-537.
    19. Ring, Irene, 1997. "Evolutionary strategies in environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 237-249, December.
    20. Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & de Groot, Rudolf & Lomas, Pedro L. & Montes, Carlos, 2010. "The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1209-1218, April.
    21. Teun Wolters, 2022. "Why is ecological sustainability so difficult to achieve? An in‐context discussion of conceptual barriers," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 2025-2039, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:22001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/doufzde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.