IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tucitm/1302.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen

Author

Listed:
  • Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja

Abstract

Soziale Innovationen werden als wichtiges Instrument für eine nachhaltige Transformation erachtet. Soziale Innovationen, wie auch andere Innovationsarten, entstehen in einem Innovationssystem, welches deren aktuellen Stand erklärt und zukünftige Entwicklung beeinflusst. Das Innovationssystem erfasst dabei die Akteure und deren Verbindungen, den politischen, wirtschaftlichen, rechtlichen und soziokulturellen Rahmen sowie eingebrachte Ressourcen wie Finanzen, Bildung, Forschung und Interessensvertretung. Da sich diese Faktoren regional, bundes- und europaweit sowie global unterscheiden können, sind Betrachtungen sinnvoll, die ein konkretes Gebiet wie z. B. ein Bundesland in den Fokus nehmen. In diesem Working Paper wird das Innovationssystem in Sachsen untersucht, um herauszufinden, wie sich das aktuelle Innovationssystem aus der Perspektive von sozialen Innovationen erfassen und darstellen lässt. Zusammenfassend lässt sich festhalten, dass vor allem zwei Akteursgruppen, die Sozialwirtschaft und das Sozialunternehmertum, maßgebliche Gestalter sozialer Innovationen in Sachsen sein können. Allerdings sie die aktuellen Gegebenheiten des Innovationssystems, z. B. politische Förderung oder Finanzmittelressourcen, für soziale Innovationen als unterschiedlich für beide Akteursgruppen einzuschätzen. Außerdem ist bei beiden Akteursgruppen eine Vorstellung zu gemeinsamer Bearbeitung sozialer Herausforderung kaum vorhanden bzw. von Vorurteilen und Angst um Ressourcen geprägt. Im Rahmen dieses Working Papers, nach der Aufarbeitung des aktuellen Situation beider Akteursgruppen und der Einbettung im Innovationssystem, wird das Potenzial für kooperative Bearbeitung gesellschaftlicher Problemlagen in Sachsen dargestellt. Außerdem werden primäre Problemlagen des Innovationssystems aus der Sicht der Expertinnen und Experten zur Umsetzung sozialer Innovationen in Sachsen beschrieben. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit basieren dabei auf einer Sekundärdatenanalyse sowie acht Experteninterviews mit Vertreterinnen und Vertretern der Sozialwirtschaft und des Sozialunternehmertums. Aus wissenschaftlicher Perspektive wird ein Beitrag zum Verständnis von Innovationsprozessen in der Sozialwirtschaft oder dem dritten Sektor geleistet. Außerdem wird ein Analyseraster zur Erfassung gesellschaftlicher Problemlagen und den etablierten und fehlenden sozialen Praktiken aufgestellt und genutzt. Dieses Analyseraster erfasst gleichermaßen die primären Akteursgruppen sozialer Innovationen erfasst, die sich wiederum im Rahmen der Möglichkeiten des aktuellen Innovationssystem derer Bearbeitung zuwenden.

Suggested Citation

  • Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja, 2022. "Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen," Working Papers of the Chair for Innovation Research and Technology Management (BWL IX) 13-02, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, revised 2022.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tucitm:1302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/260560/1/WP_Innovationssystem%20Sachsen_220623_TUC%20Design%20Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Portales, 2019. "Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-13456-3, April.
    2. Warnke, Philine & Koschatzky, Knut & Dönitz, Ewa & Zenker, Andrea & Stahlecker, Thomas & Som, Oliver & Cuhls, Kerstin & Güth, Sandra, 2016. "Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 49, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. Lundvall, Bengt-Ake & Johnson, Bjorn & Andersen, Esben Sloth & Dalum, Bent, 2002. "National systems of production, innovation and competence building," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 213-231, February.
    4. Johanna Mair & Julie Battilana & Julian Cardenas, 2012. "Organizing for Society: A Typology of Social Entrepreneuring Models," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 353-373, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herrmann-Fankhänel, Anja, 2022. "Eine Fallstudie zum Innovationssystem für soziale Innovationen in Sachsen," Working Papers of the Chair for Innovation Research and Technology Management (BWL IX) 13-01, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    3. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Andrea Coveri & Antonello Zanfei, 2023. "Who wins the race for knowledge-based competitiveness? Comparing European and North American FDI patterns," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 292-330, February.
    6. Balázs Lengyel & Vladislav Cadil, 2009. "Innovation Policy Challenges in Transition Countries: Foreign Business R&D in the Czech Republic and Hungary," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 16(1), pages 174-188, May.
    7. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    8. Roth, Florian & Warnke, Philine & Niessen, Pia & Edler, Jakob, 2021. "Insights into systemic resilience from innovation research," Perspectives – Policy Briefs 03 / 2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    9. Mário Franco & Heiko Haase & Sandra Correia, 2018. "Exploring Factors in the Success of Creative Incubators: a Cultural Entrepreneurship Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(1), pages 239-262, March.
    10. Marte C.W. Solheim & Ron Boschma & Sverre Herstad, 2018. "Related variety, unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1836, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2018.
    11. Judith Fessehaie & Zavareh Rustomjee & Lauralyn Kaziboni, 2016. "Mining-related national systems of innovation in southern Africa National trajectories and regional integration," WIDER Working Paper Series 084, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Souzanchi Kashani, Ebrahim & Roshani, Saeed, 2019. "Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 68-80.
    13. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    14. Radziwon, Agnieszka & Bogers, Marcel, 2019. "Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 573-587.
    15. Varsakelis, Nikos C., 2006. "Education, political institutions and innovative activity: A cross-country empirical investigation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1083-1090, September.
    16. Gabriel Porcile & Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2023. "Rentiers, Strategic Public Goods and Financialization in the Periphery," Working Papers PKWP2303, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    17. Mario Davide Parrilli, 2010. "Heterogeneous Social Capitals: A New Window of Opportunity for Local Economies," Working Papers 2010R06, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    18. Babita Bhatt & Israr Qureshi & Suhaib Riaz, 2019. "Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 605-630, February.
    19. Seungil Yum, 2019. "The interaction between knowledge-intensive business services and urban economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 53-83, August.
    20. Binz, Christian & Gosens, Jorrit & Hansen, Teis & Hansen, Ulrich Elmer, 2017. "Toward Technology-Sensitive Catching-Up Policies: Insights from Renewable Energy in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 418-437.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tucitm:1302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtucde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.