IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb475/200427.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the Equivalence of Optimality Design Criteria for the Placebo-Treatment Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Wong, Weng Kee
  • Dette, Holger
  • Zhu, Wei

Abstract

We consider a class of optimality criteria and show that each crite- rion has its unique and equivalent dual within the class. This property can be used to find a variety of optimal designs, including a class of compound optimal designs and their relationships. As an example, we show that one type of D-optimal design provides analytical formula for a class of compound optimal designs, while its dual, the more traditional criterion, cannot.

Suggested Citation

  • Wong, Weng Kee & Dette, Holger & Zhu, Wei, 2004. "On the Equivalence of Optimality Design Criteria for the Placebo-Treatment Problem," Technical Reports 2004,27, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:200427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/22539/1/tr27-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holger Dette, 1993. "A new interpretation of optimality forE-optimal designs in linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 37-50, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Liu & Rong-Xian Yue, 2013. "A note on $$R$$ -optimal designs for multiresponse models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 483-493, May.
    2. Dette, Holger & Wong, Weng Kee & Zhu, Wei, 2005. "On the equivalence of optimality design criteria for the placebo-treatment problem," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(4), pages 337-346, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:200427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isdorde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.