IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sefggs/52019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multilateralismus gestalten! Prinzipien und Chancen multilateraler Kooperation in den UN

Author

Listed:
  • Hirschmann, Gisela
  • Ulbert, Cornelia

Abstract

Die schwindende Unterstützung multilateraler Zusammenarbeit durch wichtige weltpolitische Akteure bedroht auch die Handlungsfähigkeit internationaler Organisationen. Verschiedene Initiativen zum 75. Jubiläum der Vereinten Nationen (UN) im Jahr 2020 zielen darauf, diese Handlungsfähigkeit wiederherzustellen. Ansatzpunkte dafür sehen Gisela Hirschmann und Cornelia Ulbert im Global Governance Spotlight 5|2019 erstens in der flexiblen Bildung von Koalitionen, auch unter Einbezug nichtstaatlicher Akteure, zweitens in institutionellen Reformen zur effektiveren Problembearbeitung und drittens in der Vermittlung der Notwendigkeit multilateraler Problemlösung in die Gesellschaften hinein.

Suggested Citation

  • Hirschmann, Gisela & Ulbert, Cornelia, 2019. "Multilateralismus gestalten! Prinzipien und Chancen multilateraler Kooperation in den UN," Global Governance Spotlight 5/2019, Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden (SEF), Bonn.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sefggs:52019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/213352/1/1683970330.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruggie, John Gerard, 1992. "Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 561-598, July.
    2. Thomas Hale & David Held, 2018. "Breaking the Cycle of Gridlock," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(1), pages 129-137, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michał Dulak, 2023. "Contribution of subnational authorities to multilateralism from the EU perspective—Implementation of the SDGs," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S2), pages 13-21, March.
    2. John Ravenhill, 2012. "The Numbers Game in Asia-Pacific Cooperation," Chapters, in: Christopher M. Dent & Jörn Dosch (ed.), The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism and the Global System, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6881 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Minna Havukainen & Mirja Mikkilä & Helena Kahiluoto, 2022. "Climate Policy Reform in Nepal through the Lenses of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Arnold J. Bomans & Peter Roessingh, 2024. "Decision Change: The First Step to System Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Mark Beeson & Jolanta Hewitt, 2022. "Does Multilateralism still Matter? ASEAN and the Arctic Council in Comparative Perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 208-218, May.
    7. Stranadko, Nataliya, 2021. "EU-US climate cooperation: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the Paris agreement," Discussion Papers 02/2021, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    8. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s5:p:15-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lauri Siitonen, 2022. "A normative power or fortress Europe? Normative policy coherence between the European Unionʼs development, migration, and foreign policies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S1), June.
    10. Daniel Verdier, 2009. "Successful and Failed Screening Mechanisms in the Two Gulf Wars," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 311-342, July.
    11. Nathan Jensen, 2007. "International institutions and market expectations: Stock price responses to the WTO ruling on the 2002 U.S. steel tariffs," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 261-280, September.
    12. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Erin R. Graham, 2017. "Follow the Money: How Trends in Financing Are Changing Governance at International Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 15-25, August.
    13. Gorm Rye Olsen, 2022. "Twenty-First Century Military Multilateralism: “Messy” and With Unintended Consequences," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 15-24.
    14. Eric Tremolada Álvarez, 2018. "La Cooperación Internacional como alternativa a los unilateralismos. colección Ius Cogens n.° 6," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1037.
    15. Jürgen Rüland, 2012. "The rise of “diminished multilateralism”: East Asian and European forum shopping in global governance," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 255-270, March.
    16. Yang, Deli, 2019. "National treatment, institutions and IP uncertainties: An analytics of compliance, change and comparability," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    17. Lora Anne Viola, 2020. "US Strategies of Institutional Adaptation in the Face of Hegemonic Decline," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 28-39, October.
    18. Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2016. "Accession clause of TPP : Is it really open?," IDE Discussion Papers 606, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    19. Oscar Ugarteche, 2016. "Towards the Privatization of Global Governance?," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 59(1), pages 14-20, June.
    20. Roxana Hincu, 2014. "The Eu-Us Relations In An Emerging Multipolar World," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(2a), pages 111-122, August.
    21. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/6881 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Yang, Deli & Sonmez, Mahmut, 2013. "Integration and divergence of patent systems across national and international institutions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 527-538.
    23. Zürn, Michael, 1994. "We can do much better! Aber muß es auf amerikanisch sein? Zum Vergleich der Disziplin "Internationale Beziehungen" in den USA und in Deutschland," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 1, pages 91-114.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sefggs:52019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sef-bonn.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.