IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/safepl/23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How important are hedge funds in a crisis?

Author

Listed:
  • Gropp, Reint E.

Abstract

Before the 2007-09 crisis, standard risk measurement methods substantially underestimated the threat to the financial system. One reason was that these methods didn't account for how closely commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, and insurance companies were linked. As financial conditions worsened in one type of institution, the effects spread to others. A new method that more accurately accounts for these spillover effects suggests that hedge funds may have been central in generating systemic risk during the crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gropp, Reint E., 2014. "How important are hedge funds in a crisis?," SAFE Policy Letters 23, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:safepl:23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/106973/1/817047360.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adams, Zeno & Füss, Roland & Gropp, Reint, 2014. "Spillover Effects among Financial Institutions: A State-Dependent Sensitivity Value-at-Risk Approach," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 575-598, June.
    2. Björn Döhring & Heliodoro Temprano-Arroyo, 2008. "Implications of EMU for Global Macroeconomic and Financial Stability," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 343, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    3. Ben S. Bernanke, 2006. "Hedge funds and systemic risk," Speech 198, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    4. repec:fip:fedgsq:y:2006:i:may12 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark D. Flood & Phillip Monin & Lina Bandyopadhyay, 2015. "Gauging Form PF: Data Tolerances in Regulatory Reporting on Hedge Fund Risk Exposures," Working Papers 15-13, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    2. Ghulam, Yaseen & Doering, Jana, 2018. "Spillover effects among financial institutions within Germany and the United Kingdom," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 49-63.
    3. Zsuzsánna Biedermann & Ágnes Orosz, 2015. "Diverging financial regulations after the crisis? A comparison of the EU’s and the United States’ responses," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 14(1), pages 31-55.
    4. Mark D. Flood & Phillip Monin, 2016. "Form PF and Hedge Funds: Risk-measurement Precision for Option Portfolios," Working Papers 16-02, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Carolyn W. & Li, Xiaodan & Lin, Edward M.H. & Yu, Min-Teh, 2018. "Systemic risk, interconnectedness, and non-core activities in Taiwan insurance industry," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 273-284.
    2. van de Leur, Michiel C.W. & Lucas, André & Seeger, Norman J., 2017. "Network, market, and book-based systemic risk rankings," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 84-90.
    3. Christian Eckert, 2020. "Risk and risk management of spillover effects: Evidence from the literature," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(1), pages 75-104, March.
    4. Aye, Goodness C. & Gil-Alana, Luis A. & Gupta, Rangan & Wohar, Mark E., 2017. "The efficiency of the art market: Evidence from variance ratio tests, linear and nonlinear fractional integration approaches," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 283-294.
    5. Martin Eling & David Antonius Pankoke, 2016. "Systemic Risk in the Insurance Sector: A Review and Directions for Future Research," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 19(2), pages 249-284, September.
    6. Yang, Xin & Wen, Shigang & Zhao, Xian & Huang, Chuangxia, 2020. "Systemic importance of financial institutions: A complex network perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    7. Bei, Zeyun & Lin, Juan & Zhou, Yinggang, 2024. "No safe haven, only diversification and contagion — Intraday evidence around the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Gang-Jin Wang & Chi Xie & Kaijian He & H. Eugene Stanley, 2017. "Extreme risk spillover network: application to financial institutions," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1417-1433, September.
    9. Bernal, Oscar & Gnabo, Jean-Yves & Guilmin, Grégory, 2014. "Assessing the contribution of banks, insurance and other financial services to systemic risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 270-287.
    10. Nguyen, Linh Hoang & Chevapatrakul, Thanaset & Yao, Kai, 2020. "Investigating tail-risk dependence in the cryptocurrency markets: A LASSO quantile regression approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 333-355.
    11. Brunnermeier, Markus K. & Oehmke, Martin, 2013. "Bubbles, Financial Crises, and Systemic Risk," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1221-1288, Elsevier.
    12. Ghulam, Yaseen & Doering, Jana, 2018. "Spillover effects among financial institutions within Germany and the United Kingdom," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 49-63.
    13. Adams, Zeno & Glück, Thorsten, 2013. "Financialization in Commodity Markets: Disentangling the Crisis from the Style Effect," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79949, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Hossein Dastkhan, 2021. "Network‐based early warning system to predict financial crisis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 594-616, January.
    15. Can-Zhong Yao & Ze-Kun Zhang & Yan-Li Li, 2023. "The Analysis of Risk Measurement and Association in China’s Financial Sector Using the Tail Risk Spillover Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-35, June.
    16. Tristan Jourde, 2022. "The Rising Interconnectedness of the Insurance Sector," Working papers 857, Banque de France.
    17. Adams, Zeno & Glück, Thorsten, 2015. "Financialization in commodity markets: A passing trend or the new normal?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 93-111.
    18. Kraft, Holger & Schmidt, Alexander, 2013. "Systemic risk in the financial sector: What can se learn from option markets?," SAFE Working Paper Series 25, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    19. Moratis, Georgios & Sakellaris, Plutarchos, 2021. "Measuring the systemic importance of banks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Yu Chen & Jie Hu & Weiping Zhang, 2020. "Too Connected to Fail? Evidence from a Chinese Financial Risk Spillover Network," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(6), pages 78-100, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    systemic risk analysis; statistical risk measurement; spillover effects;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:safepl:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csafede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.