IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/opodis/20223.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The BRI: Trade integration and stock market synchronization. A review of empirical findings

Author

Listed:
  • Heß, Alexander
  • Hindermann, Christoph Michael

Abstract

In the context of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), we review selected studies that explicitly or implicitly address the question of whether there occurs synchronization of stock markets between China and the BRI economies. Following this, we examine the extent to which this synchronization of stock markets may be driven by bilateral trade. This question is of particular interest to investors who wish to profit from the BRI while minimizing their risk through portfolio diversification. Our results show that there is plenty of supporting evidence that the stock markets of China and the BRI economies are synchronized, and that synchronization appears to be increasing since the launch of the BRI. We also find that bilateral trade is an important determinant for explaining stock market integration between China and the BRI countries. Based on these results, interregional diversification appears to be less efficient. Further research is needed to determine whether other forms of diversification, such as inter-industry diversification, would be more beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Heß, Alexander & Hindermann, Christoph Michael, 2022. "The BRI: Trade integration and stock market synchronization. A review of empirical findings," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2022-3, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:opodis:20223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/261208/1/1809442095.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burdekin, Richard C. K & Tao, Ran, 2021. "From Shanghai to Sydney: Chinese stock market influences on Australia," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    2. Li Yang & Francis Tapon & Yiguo Sun, 2006. "International correlations across stock markets and industries: trends and patterns 1988-2002," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(16), pages 1171-1183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Araújo, Eurilton, 2009. "Macroeconomic shocks and the co-movement of stock returns in Latin America," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 331-344, December.
    2. Martin T. Bohl & Pierre Siklos, 2004. "Empirical Evidence on Feedback Trading in Mature and Emerging Stock Markets," Research Paper Series 137, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    3. Sudharshan Reddy Paramati & Rakesh Gupta & Kishore Tandon, 2016. "Dynamic analysis of time-varying correlations and cointegration relationship between Australia and frontier equity markets," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 121-145.
    4. Sekuła Paweł, 2019. "Causality Analysis Between Stock Market Indices," Financial Sciences. Nauki o Finansach, Sciendo, vol. 24(1), pages 74-93, March.
    5. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Chen, Mei-Ping & Chang, Chi-Hung, 2013. "Dynamic relationships between industry returns and stock market returns," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 119-144.
    6. Qing Xu & Xiao-Ming Li, 2009. "Estimation of dynamic asymmetric tail dependences: an empirical study on Asian developed futures markets," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 273-290.
    7. Olasupo Olusi & Haikal Abdul-Majid, 2008. "Diversification prospects in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) equity markets: a synthesis and an update," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(18), pages 1451-1463.
    8. Zura Kakushadze & Willie Yu, 2017. "Open Source Fundamental Industry Classification," Papers 1706.04210, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    9. Chia‐Hsien Tang & Yen‐Hsien Lee & Hung‐Chun Liu & Guan‐Gzhe Zeng, 2024. "Exploring the unpredictable nature of climate policy uncertainty: An empirical analysis of its impact on commodity futures returns in the United States," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 1277-1292, July.
    10. Marguerite Schneider & Lori Ryan, 2011. "A review of hedge funds and their investor activism: do they help or hurt other equity investors?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(3), pages 349-374, August.
    11. Massimo Guidolin & Stuart Hyde, 2009. "What tames the Celtic Tiger? Portfolio implications from a Multivariate Markov Switching model," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 463-488.
    12. Burdekin, Richard C.K. & Reckers, Dawson & Tao, Ran, 2022. "Quantifying China’s financial reach up through the pandemic: The African experience," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    13. Zura Kakushadze & Willie Yu, 2017. "Open Source Fundamental Industry Classification," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-77, June.
    14. Singh, Amit & Jenamani, Mamata & Thakkar, Jitesh J. & Rana, Nripendra P., 2021. "Propagation of online consumer perceived negativity: Quantifying the effect of supply chain underperformance on passenger car sales," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 102-114.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:opodis:20223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ordnungspolitisches-portal.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.