IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/opodis/20213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Road and Belt, Iron Silk Road and Russian-Chinese geopolitical cooperation and competition

Author

Listed:
  • Lukin, Artyom

Abstract

This paper examines political and economic dimensions of the Russia-China relationship, with an emphasis on Russia's involvement in Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Being the largest, and trans-continental, Eurasian country, Russia occupies an important place in China's BRI. The current relationship between the two great Eurasian powers can be characterized as an entente, or quasi-alliance. Moscow welcomes the BRI, but, unlike many other governments across the world, it has never signed an agreement to formally join the initiative. This signals Russia's stance that Eurasian integration should not be dominated by China, as well as the Kremlin's insistence on status equality with China. In recent years there has been a noticeable rise in shipments from China to Europe, and in the reverse direction, using the rail routes via Russia. However, despite the increase in its trans-continental freight traffic going via Russia, China still refrains from investing in the upgrade of Russia's transport networks, such as railroads, ports and highways, and is overall reluctant to invest in the Russian economy. The reasons are both economic, such as the relatively high risks and low profit margins in the Russian market, and political ones, related to Russia's insistence on parity and equality with China.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukin, Artyom, 2021. "Road and Belt, Iron Silk Road and Russian-Chinese geopolitical cooperation and competition," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-3, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:opodis:20213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/233898/1/1757278443.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kolev, Stefan, 2010. "Der bulgarische Weg seit 1989: Wachstum ohne Ordnung?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2010-12, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schneegans, Tim, 2019. "Escaping the comfort zone: A three-level perspective on filtering effects and counter-measures," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-05, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    2. Rõigas, Kärt, 2011. "Linkage between productivity and innovation in different service sectors," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    3. Sepp, Jüri & Kaldaru, Helje & Joamets, Jürgen, 2014. "The characteristics and position of the economic structures of Estonia and Korea among the OECD countries," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2014-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    4. Kolev, Stefan, 2017. "Individualism and demographic change," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2017-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    5. Platje, Joost, 2011. "Institutional change for creating capacity and capability for sustainable development: A club good perspective," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-06, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    6. Effelsberg, Martin, 2011. "Measuring absorptive capacity of national innovation systems," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    7. Seliger, Bernhard, 2020. "North Korea's political economy: Hybrid economic institutions and the contributions of German order policy (Ordnungspolitik)," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2020-2, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    8. Seidt, Hans-Ulrich, 2021. "Korea and Germany as endpoints of the new silk road: Opportunities for cooperation," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-4, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    9. Park, Sung-Jo, 2013. "Developmental state in Korea (60-70ties) revisited: Institution-building for the making of 'coordinated market'," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2013-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    10. Ukrainski, Kadri & Kanep, Hanna & Kirs, Margit & Karo, Erkki, 2019. "International R&D networks of firms: A country-level analysis of the EU framework programmes," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-01, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    11. Sepp, Jüri & Varblane, Uku, 2014. "The decomposition of productivity gap between Estonia and Korea," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2014-03, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    12. Wrobel, Ralph, 2021. "Kim Jong-un's Byungjin Policy: Support or obstacle for economic convergence on the Korean peninsula?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-5, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    13. Yalamova, Rossitsa, 2019. "Blockchain angels or demons of a free international order," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    14. Kim, Duyeon, 2021. "Belt and road in the new geo-political competition: China, the United States, Europe and Korea," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-8, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    15. Panda, Jagannath P., 2021. "China's BRI diplomacy: What it means to India and India's rise," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-12, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    16. Heß, Alexander & Hindermann, Christoph Michael, 2021. "Trade effects on happiness in Asia," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-9, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    17. Go, Joohyun, 2021. "The prospects of cultural exchange to foster the economic relationship between the EU and Korea," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-7, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    18. Komulainen, Ruey, 2015. "Employer branding for SMEs: Attracting graduating students in IT industry," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2015-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    19. Tamm, Dorel & Ukrainski, Kadri, 2011. "Functional approach to national systems of innovation: The case of a small catching-up country," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-07, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    20. Hoen, Herman W., 2013. "Emerging market economies and the financial crisis: Is there institutional convergence between Europe and Asia?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2013-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Russia-China relations; the Belt and Road Initiative; Eurasia;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:opodis:20213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ordnungspolitisches-portal.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.