IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/oefsew/71.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The criticality of lithium and the sustainability-finance nexus: Supply-demand perceptions, state policies, production networks, and financial actors

Author

Listed:
  • Wojewska, Aleksandra
  • Staritz, Cornelia
  • Tröster, Bernhard
  • Leisenheimer, Luisa

Abstract

The eco-technological fix to the climate crisis renders certain resources, such as lithium, as "critical". We argue that criticality is actively produced in socio-technological processes, involving three interrelated levels - demand, supply and price perceptions, policies linked to green extractivism, and underlying narratives around the role of commodities in development. Criticality is interrelated with firm strategies in global production networks (GPNs) as well as financial actors' strategies, legitimizing extractivism for sustainability transformations. We highlight the role of financial actors and interests in enabling lithium expansion and assess two channels through which financial actors shape producer strategies and GPNs - financing and price-determination. Driven by criticality, financial actors mobilize "green" investment stories along the sustainability-finance nexus. This enables the shifting of extractive frontiers through funding new projects and creates variable price-setting regimes linked to derivative markets. Financial interests introduce an additional speculative momentum to lithium extraction, contributing to accelerating boom-bust patterns and short-termism. Methodologically, the paper draws on sector data, industry and company reports, as well as semi-structured interviews with lithium sector and financial actors in London, Switzerland, Chile and Zimbabwe.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojewska, Aleksandra & Staritz, Cornelia & Tröster, Bernhard & Leisenheimer, Luisa, 2023. "The criticality of lithium and the sustainability-finance nexus: Supply-demand perceptions, state policies, production networks, and financial actors," Working Papers 71, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:oefsew:71
    DOI: 10.60637/2023-wp71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/269251/1/1838229078.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.60637/2023-wp71?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthea Roberts & Henrique Choer Moraes & Victor Ferguson, 2019. "Toward a Geoeconomic Order in International Trade and Investment," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 655-676.
    2. World Bank, 2021. "Toolkits for Policymakers to Green the Financial System," World Bank Publications - Reports 35705, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajavuori, Mikko & Huhta, Kaisa, 2020. "Investment screening: Implications for the energy sector and energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Vivoda, Vlado & Matthews, Ron & McGregor, Neil, 2024. "A critical minerals perspective on the emergence of geopolitical trade blocs," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Agung Satyadini & Ligang Song, 2023. "Modern entrepreneurship and the ‘doughnut’: productive or destructive?," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 37(2), pages 119-141, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    green extractivism; lithium; criticality of resources; sustainability-finance nexus; global production networks;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:oefsew:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ofsewat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.