IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse17/169498.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ICT Use, Connectivity, and Innovation Capability in Japanese SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Shigeno, Hidenori
  • Tsuji, Masatsugu
  • Matsuzaki, Taisuke
  • Shinohara, Sobee

Abstract

This paper seeks to construct a new theory on SME innovation by reviewing and comprehending findings and knowledge obtained to date from a unified perspective. Conventional research on innovation in general has focused thematically on individual factors such as absorptive capability, R&D, and open innovation. While this approach has its advantages, it is critical to research innovation as a single process from a broad perspective and framework. This analyzes how SMEs acquire new information and ideas that are the source of innovation, organize and conduct R&D to integrate these ideas with management resources within the frim, and finally, how they produce the concrete output of these steps that lead to the development of new products. Our research especially seeks to answer what elements are needed in this process, and how they should be combined. In addition, this paper focuses on internal innovation capability which includes factors such as technologies that the company own, human resources (human factor), managerial organizational form (organization), leadership, and so on. These factors also consist of detailed sub-factors. The examples of the third layer contain as the following factors, for example. The technological factor includes the following factors: (a) ratio of R&D expenditure to sales; (b) the number of intellectual property right owned; and (c) technical and management systems such as R&D. (ii) Managerial organization indicates whether the managerial organization is designed and functioning to encourage exchange and share information among employees or communications inside the firm for innovation. This consists of the following sub-factors: (d) practicing QC circle; (e) cross-functional team; (f) information sharing system using ICT; and (g) the traditional background to stimulate discussions and communications among sections of the firms. Finally, the human resources is an important factor for engaging in innovation activities as well as for design and managing R&D, which consist of the following sub-factors: (h) ability of top management such as degrees or experiences; (i) leadership of top management; (j) degrees and experiences of employees; and (k) the Human Resource Development scheme (HRD) such as OJT (On-the-job training) or OFFJT (Off-the-job training). This paper particularly focuses on factors such as technology, R&D, and ICT use.

Suggested Citation

  • Shigeno, Hidenori & Tsuji, Masatsugu & Matsuzaki, Taisuke & Shinohara, Sobee, 2017. "ICT Use, Connectivity, and Innovation Capability in Japanese SMEs," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169498, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse17:169498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/169498/1/Shigeno-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masatsugu Tsuji & Hiroki Idota & Yasushi Ueki & Hidenori Shigeno & Teruyuki Bunno, 2016. "Connectivity in the Technology Transfer Process among Local ASEAN Firms," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 10(3), September.
    2. Josh Lerner & Julie Wulf, 2007. "Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 89(4), pages 634-644, November.
    3. Todo, Yasuyuki & Matous, Petr & Inoue, Hiroyasu, 2016. "The strength of long ties and the weakness of strong ties: Knowledge diffusion through supply chain networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1890-1906.
    4. Benn Lawson & Danny Samson, 2001. "Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 377-400.
    5. Leonard-Barton, Dorothy, 1988. "Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 251-267, October.
    6. Gabriel Szulanski & Rossella Cappetta & Robert J. Jensen, 2004. "When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 600-613, October.
    7. Daniel Z. Levin & Rob Cross, 2004. "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1477-1490, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taisuke Matsuzaki & Hidenori Shigeno & Teruyuki Bunno & Hiroki Idota & Masatsugu Tsuji, 2023. "The Relationship Between Innovation and Corporate Performance in Japanese SMEs by Two-Stage Panel Data Analysis: Focusing on the Joint Effect of ICT and R&D," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 55-71, April.
    2. Matsuzaki, Taisuke & Shigeno, Hidenori & Taher, Sheikh Abu & Tsuji, Masatsugu, 2022. "Relationship between Innovation and Corporate Performance in Japanese SMEs by Two-stage Panel Data Analysis: Focusing on the Joint Effect of ICT and R&D," 31st European Regional ITS Conference, Gothenburg 2022: Reining in Digital Platforms? Challenging monopolies, promoting competition and developing regulatory regimes 265659, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Shigeno, Hidenori & Bunno, Teruyuki & Abu Taher, Sheikh & Tsuji, Masatsugu, 2020. "R&D and ICT in the Innovation Process of Japanese Innovative SMEs: Panel Data Analysis Based on Firm-Level Survey Data," ITS Conference, Online Event 2020 224875, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Tsuji, Masatsugu & Ueki, Yasushi & Shigeno, Hidenori & Bunno, Teruyuki & Idota, Hiroki, 2018. "ICT and Two Categories of R&D in the Innovation Process among Firms in ASEAN Countries Based on Firm-level Survey Data," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184970, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Shigeno, Hidenori & Matsuzaki, Taisuke & Ueki, Yasushi & Tsuji, Masatsugu, 2023. "The Effect of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Innovation Process of Small and Medium-sized Regional Firms," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 278018, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    6. Xin Liu & Lin Zhang & Abhinav Gupta & Xiaoming Zheng & Changqi Wu, 2022. "Upper echelons and intra‐organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2351-2381, November.
    7. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    8. Jordi Molas-Gallart & Pablo D’Este & Oscar Llopis & Ismael Rafols, 2016. "Towards an alternative framework for the evaluation of translational research initiatives," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 235-243.
    9. Raj Kumar Shukla & Dr. Sanjay R. Mali, 2015. "Planning Skills for Solar Supply Chain Management," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 6(3), pages 53-57, September.
    10. Arunachalam, S. & Ramaswami, Sridhar N. & Patel, Pankaj C. & Chai, Linlin, 2022. "Innovation-based strategic flexibility (ISF): Role of CEO ties with marketing and R&D," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 927-946.
    11. Renzl, Birgit, 2008. "Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 206-220, April.
    12. Pérez-Nordtvedt, Liliana & Babakus, Emin & Kedia, Ben L., 2010. "Learning from international business affiliates: developing resource-based learning capacity through networks and knowledge acquisition," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 262-274, September.
    13. Michailova, Snejina & Mustaffa, Zaidah, 2012. "Subsidiary knowledge flows in multinational corporations: Research accomplishments, gaps, and opportunities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 383-396.
    14. Yan Tian & Yuan Li & Zelong Wei, 2013. "Managerial Incentive and External Knowledge Acquisition Under Technological Uncertainty: A Nested System Perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 214-228, May.
    15. Omrane, Amina, 2022. "The main determinants and effects of product innovation: An exploratory study on the pastry companies of the region of Sfax (in Tunisia)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Francesco Ciabuschi & Oscar Martín Martín & Benjamin Ståhl, 2010. "Headquarters’ Influence on Knowledge Transfer Performance," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 471-491, August.
    17. Speckbacher, Gerhard & Wabnegg, Markus, 2020. "Incentivizing innovation: The role of knowledge exchange and distal search behavior," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Ravishankar, M.N. & Pan, Shan L., 2008. "The influence of organizational identification on organizational knowledge management (KM)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 221-234, April.
    19. Daniel Tzabbar & Jeongsik (Jay) Lee & Donghwi (Josh) Seo, 2022. "Collaborative structure and post‐mobility knowledge spillovers: A dyadic approach," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1728-1762, September.
    20. Jin Nam Choi, 2009. "Collective Dynamics of Citizenship Behaviour: What Group Characteristics Promote Group‐Level Helping?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1396-1420, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    External linkages; SEM; causality; open innovation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse17:169498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.