IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse17/169496.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The beta in the WACC for regulated fixed and mobile telecommunica-tions services: Its role and robust estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Schmitt, Stephan
  • Neu, Werner

Abstract

It is a highly controversial topic, both in the regulatory as well as the scientific research environment, whether the beta factor – as a measure for systematic risk – for fixed line and that for mobile operations has actually the same value. Since most telecommunica-tions operators are today integrated, offering both types of services, It is difficult to ad-dress this empirical question directly. This paper contributes to the discussion by provid-ing new empirical evidence with an approach that is a bit more sophisticated than is typically the case. Using an especially derived panel data set for 16 European tele-communications operators, covering the period 2010 through 2016, we tested the main hypothesis regarding the impact of mobile operations on risk, as well as carried out a preliminary test regarding the validity of the Modigliani/Miller formula needed for the main hypothesis. We do not find any empirical evidence that the risk parameters of fixed line and mobile network operators are different. Instead, they seem to be rather similar or within in the same range. Second, as a byproduct, we are not able to empiri-cally confirm the Modigliani/Miller formula according to which the transformation of the equity betas into asset betas depends essentially on the debt/equity ratio assuming in the process a debt beta equal to zero. Our results rather confirm the findings of other studies suggesting that the debt beta is strictly positive.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmitt, Stephan & Neu, Werner, 2017. "The beta in the WACC for regulated fixed and mobile telecommunica-tions services: Its role and robust estimation," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169496, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse17:169496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/169496/1/Schmitt-Neu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barth, Anne-Kathrin & Heimeshoff, Ulrich, 2012. "How large is the magnitude of fixed-mobile call substitution? Empirical evidence from 16 European countries," DICE Discussion Papers 49, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    2. Skardziukas, Domantas, 2010. "Practical approach to estimating cost of capital," MPRA Paper 31011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Chalmeau, Olivier, 2013. "Determinants of European telecommunication operators systematic risk," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88495, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Ingo Vogelsang, 2003. "Price Regulation of Access to Telecommunications Networks," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 41(3), pages 830-862, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torsten Steinrücken & Sebastian Jaenichen, 2009. "Preisregulierung zum Schutz der Verbraucher: Wirkungen auf Werbung und Wohlfahrt," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 78(3), pages 188-201.
    2. Grzybowski, Lukasz, 2014. "Fixed-to-mobile substitution in the European Union," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 601-612.
    3. Jeong-Yoo Kim, 2009. "Competition in the LM market," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 209-218, October.
    4. Hoernig, Steffen & Bourreau, Marc & Cambini, Carlo, 2015. "Fixed-mobile substitution and termination rates," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 65-76.
    5. de Bijl, P.W.J. & Peitz, M., 2004. "Unbundling the Local Loop : One-Way Access and Imperfect Competition," Discussion Paper 2004-025, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    6. Krancke, Jan & Vidal, Miguel & Fier, Andreas, 2012. "Changing the rules: Applying a more economic approach to dynamic telecom markets," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 66976, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Peitz, Martin & Valletti, Tommaso M. & Wright, Julian, 2004. "Competition in telecommunications: an introduction," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 315-321, September.
    8. Marc Bourreau & Carlo Cambini & Steffen Hoernig & Ingo Vogelsang, 2020. "Fiber investment and access under uncertainty: long-term contracts, risk premia, and access options," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 105-117, April.
    9. Lopez, Angel & Rey, Patrick, 2009. "Foreclosing Competition through Access Charges and Price Discrimination," TSE Working Papers 09-056, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised 02 Apr 2015.
    10. Jahn, Eric & Prüfer, Jens, 2008. "Interconnection and competition among asymmetric networks in the Internet backbone market," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 243-256, September.
    11. Keizo Mizuno & Ichiro Yoshino, 2015. "Overusing a bypass under cost-based access regulation: underinvestment with spillovers," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 29-57, February.
    12. Edmond Baranes & Cuong Huong Vuong, 2012. "Policy Implications of Asymmetric Termination Rate Regulation in Europe," Chapters, in: Gerald R. Faulhaber & Gary Madden & Jeffrey Petchey (ed.), Regulation and the Performance of Communication and Information Networks, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Inderst, Roman & Peitz, Martin, 2012. "Network investment, access and competition," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 407-418.
    14. Brito, Duarte & Pereira, Pedro & Vareda, João, 2010. "Can two-part tariffs promote efficient investment on next generation networks?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 323-333, May.
    15. Martin Quinn & Miguel Godinho de Matos & Christian Peukert, 2024. "The Welfare Effects of Mobile Internet Access: Evidence from Roam-Like-at-Home," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(659), pages 1228-1246.
    16. Øystein Foros & Hans Kind & Lars Sørgard, 2007. "Managerial incentives and access price regulation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 117-133, April.
    17. Ben Dkhil, Inès, 2014. "Competition in the Fixed Telecommunication Market Segment: Challenges and Theories," MPRA Paper 72909, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Elisabetta Iossa & Francesca Stroffolini, 2012. "Vertical Integration and Costly Demand Information in Regulated Network Industries," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 40(4), pages 249-271, June.
    19. Thomas P. Tangerås, 2014. "Network competition with income effects," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(3), pages 645-673, September.
    20. Mattia Nardotto & Tommaso Valletti & Frank Verboven, 2015. "Unbundling The Incumbent: Evidence From Uk Broadband," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 330-362, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse17:169496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.