IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/imbwps/83.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das GQMS-Vorgehensmodell für das Messen der Wirksamkeit von Informationssicherheitsmanagementsystemen

Author

Listed:
  • Rumpel, Rainer

Abstract

Der Sinn eines Managementsystems besteht darin, Abläufe systematisch und gleichbleibend verlässlich zu gestalten. Es sollen Verbesserungspotentiale erschlossen werden, um Verbesserungen vorzunehmen und nachweisbar zu erreichen. Viele Organisationen betreiben mittlerweile Managementsysteme. In Europa haben ca. 8.000 Unternehmen ein zertifiziertes Informationssicherheitsmanagementsystem in Betrieb. Viele Unternehmen haben das Problem, die Effektivität des Systems plausibel und nachvollziehbar bewerten zu können. In dieser Ausarbeitung wird ein Vorgehensmodell präsentiert, das mit der gebotenen Einfachheit und der notwendigen Fundierung ein stringentes Verfahren zur Bewertung der Wirksamkeit des Managementsystems und der Informationssicherheitsleistung bietet. Wesentliche Erfolgsfaktoren bei der Konzeptionierung des Verfahrens waren die Prozessorientierung, der Goal-Question-Metric-Ansatz und die konsequente Ausrichtung an der Norm ISO/IEC 27001.

Suggested Citation

  • Rumpel, Rainer, 2015. "Das GQMS-Vorgehensmodell für das Messen der Wirksamkeit von Informationssicherheitsmanagementsystemen," Working Papers 83, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:imbwps:83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/111285/1/827741596.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Warmdt, Luca & Užik, Martin & Löcher, Markus, 2018. "Financial signaling with open market share repurchases and private redemptions," Working Papers 93, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:imbwps:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fhwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.