IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkbw/35.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Volkswirtschaftlicher Nutzen des Nord-Ostsee-Kanals

Author

Listed:
  • Stamern, Vincent
  • Felbermayr, Gabriel
  • Schrader, Klaus
  • Stehn, Jürgen

Abstract

Die Autoren stellen fest, dass die Anzahl der Schiffspassagen durch den Nord-Ostsee-Kanal (NOK) im Beobachtungszeitraum ab 2014 rückläufig war, was allerdings nicht ausschließlich von sinkenden Marktanteilen herrührte. Nach ihrer Beobachtung senken die Transitkosten des Kanals für alle Schiffstypen deutlich die Wahrscheinlichkeit, den Kanal zu passieren. Eine Verdoppelung der Gesamtkosten würde im Durchschnitt zu einer Reduktion der Passagen um 20 Prozent führen. Eine Erhöhung des Bunkerpreises hingegen begünstigt tendenziell die Befahrung des NOK. Ihre Analyse ergibt außerdem, dass die Passage des NOK das Anlaufen des Hamburger Hafens und deutscher Häfen gegenüber den Häfen der Niederlande und Belgiens wahrscheinlicher macht. Sie ermitteln mit Hilfe des Simulationsmodells KITE (Kiel Institute Trade Policy Evaluation Model), dass insbesondere durch eine Reduktion der Handelskosten der NOK jährlich einen positiven Wohlfahrtseffekt von 570 Mio. Euro für Deutschland erbringt. Dänemark und Schweden profitieren mit 87 bzw. 88 Mio. Euro. Die Autoren regen an, durch eine flexible Gestaltung der Befahrungsabgaben die Passage für Reedereien attraktiver zu machen. Aus ökonomischer Sicht bietet sich je nach Schiffstyp eine Koppelung der Abgaben an die Bunkerpreise im Verhältnis 1:4 bzw. 1:5 an.

Suggested Citation

  • Stamern, Vincent & Felbermayr, Gabriel & Schrader, Klaus & Stehn, Jürgen, 2021. "Volkswirtschaftlicher Nutzen des Nord-Ostsee-Kanals," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 35, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/234977/1/1760363200.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heitmann, Nadine & Rehdanz, Katrin & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2013. "Determining optimal transit charges: the Kiel Canal in Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 29-42.
    2. Chowdhry, Sonali & Felbermayr, Gabriel & Hinz, Julian & Kamin, Katrin & Jacobs, Anna-Katharina & Mahlkow, Hendrik, 2020. "The economic costs of war by other means," Kiel Policy Brief 147, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Gabriel Felbermayr & Rahel Aichele & Inga Heiland, 2016. "Going Deep: The Trade and Welfare Effects of TTIP Revised," ifo Working Paper Series 219, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    4. Lorenzo Caliendo & Fernando Parro, 2015. "Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(1), pages 1-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aichele Rahel & Felbermayr Gabriel J. & Heiland Inga, 2016. "TTIP and Intra-European Trade: Boon or Bane?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 236(6), pages 639-664, December.
    2. Peter H. Egger & Katharina Erhardt, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of tariff and nontariff trade‐policy barriers in quantitative general equilibrium," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), pages 453-487, May.
    3. Oliver Krebs & Michael Pflüger, 2018. "How deep is your love? A quantitative spatial analysis of the transatlantic trade partnership," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 171-222, February.
    4. Gabriel Felbermayr & Marina Steininger & Erdal Yalcin, 2017. "Global Impact of a Protectionist U.S. Trade Policy," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 89.
    5. Gabriel Felbermayr & Marina Steininger, 2019. "Trump’s trade attack on China – who laughs last?," EconPol Policy Brief 13, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    6. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Kimura, Fukunari & Okubo, Toshihiro & Steininger, Marina, 2019. "Quantifying the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 110-128.
    7. Gabriel Felbermayr & Marina Steininger, 2019. "Trump’s trade attack on China − who will have the last laugh?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 20(01), pages 27-32, April.
    8. Chowdhry, Sonali & Felbermayr, Gabriel & Hinz, Julian & Kamin, Katrin & Jacobs, Anna-Katharina & Mahlkow, Hendrik, 2020. "The economic costs of war by other means," Kiel Policy Brief 147, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Stamer, Vincent, 2019. "Airbus-Boeing-Konflikt gefährdet Waffenstillstand mit den USA," Kiel Policy Brief 128, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    10. Felbermayr Gabriel & Steininger Marina, 2019. "Revisiting the Euro’s Trade Cost and Welfare Effects," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 239(5-6), pages 917-956, October.
    11. Patrick Bisciari, 2019. "A survey of the long-term impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU27 economies," Working Paper Research 366, National Bank of Belgium.
    12. Martin T. Braml & Marina Steininger, 2020. "Giving Away Wealth? Trade Effects of the Yuan Devaluation," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 20(04), pages 32-35, January.
    13. Timo Walter, 2022. "Trade and welfare effects of a potential free trade agreement between Japan and the United States," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(4), pages 1199-1230, November.
    14. Kohler Wilhelm & Jung Benjamin, 2017. "Wie vorteilhaft ist internationaler Handel?: Ein neuer Ansatz zur Vermessung der Gewinne," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 32-55, April.
    15. Pol Antràs & Davin Chor, 2021. "Global Value Chains," NBER Working Papers 28549, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Chae-Deug Yi, 2022. "The impact of the Japan-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement on the trade and income of Japan, the European Union, and South Korea," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 329-356, September.
    17. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
    18. Stephen J. Redding & David E. Weinstein, 2017. "Aggregating from Micro to Macro Patterns of Trade," NBER Working Papers 24051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Yuko Imura, 2023. "Reassessing Trade Barriers with Global Production Networks," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 77-116, December.
    20. Pauly, Stefan & Stipanicic, Fernando, 2021. "The creation and diffusion of knowledge: Evidence from the Jet Age," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2112, CEPREMAP.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Nord-Ostsee-Kanal; Internationaler Handel; Schifffahrt; Infrastruktur; Kiel Canal; International Trade; Maritime Shipping; Infrastructure;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.