IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/151.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comment on "Taste-Based Gender Favouritism in High-Strike Decisions: Evidence from the Price is Right"

Author

Listed:
  • Engel, Julia F.
  • Nüß, Patrick
  • Rudolph, Meike
  • Schwarz, Julia

Abstract

We conduct a computational replication of Atanasov et al. (2023). In total, our analysis covers three variations: we use the cleaned dataset provided in the replication package, we clean the original data ourselves, and finally we extend the dataset to encompass an additional three years of data using the webscraper provided by the authors. The additional data boosts the final observation count by approximately one-quarter. We find that the results are robust; the data in the replication package results in nearly the same estimates and an extension of the data and specifications reduces the effect size and statistical significance, but does not change the conclusions. We further conduct a wide range of robustness checks. While some estimates have smaller effect sizes and lower statistical significance, all results support the original findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Engel, Julia F. & Nüß, Patrick & Rudolph, Meike & Schwarz, Julia, 2024. "A Comment on "Taste-Based Gender Favouritism in High-Strike Decisions: Evidence from the Price is Right"," I4R Discussion Paper Series 151, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/302895/1/I4R-DP151.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Replication; Analysis of Collective Decision-Making; Wages; Compensation; and Labor Costs; Gender Discrimination;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
    • J7 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.