IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/139.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comment on "Influence Motives in Social Signaling: Evidence from COVID-19 Vaccinations in Germany"

Author

Listed:
  • Collins, Jason
  • Denham, Amanda Baptista
  • Du, Zhuoran
  • Waller, David

Abstract

Esguerra, Vollmer and Wimmer (2023) examined respondents' desire to influence other people's choices via their own behaviour. They conducted a field study on German residents' registration for the COVID-19 vaccination, where 1,401 "Senders" made their registration decision, which could then be shared with a peer before or after that peer's decision, providing an understanding of motives and social pressure on decisions. The authors found that individual influence motives increase a participant's likelihood to register for vaccination, but social pressure effects do not alter it. We reproduced the results using the original code and data. We tested the robustness of the primary analysis by (i) using a logistic regression model, (ii) limiting the analysis to participants who inform their partner of their decision, and (iii) changing the criteria by which participants are recorded as "verified registered". We found that these tests did not materially change the effect size estimates or the conclusions to be drawn from the analysis. We also tested the authors' sub-analysis by the level of trust in the vaccine. We found that an alternative cutoff for the high-trust group did not materially change the result.

Suggested Citation

  • Collins, Jason & Denham, Amanda Baptista & Du, Zhuoran & Waller, David, 2024. "A Comment on "Influence Motives in Social Signaling: Evidence from COVID-19 Vaccinations in Germany"," I4R Discussion Paper Series 139, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/301428/1/I4R-DP139.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emilio Esguerra & Leonhard Vollmer & Johannes Wimmer, 2023. "Influence Motives in Social Signaling: Evidence from COVID-19 Vaccinations in Germany," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 275-291, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvia Angerer & Helena Antonie Baier & Daniela Glätzle-Rützler & Philipp Lergetporer & Thomas Rittmannsberger, 2024. "Economic Preferences Predict Covid-19 Vaccination Intentions and Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 11566, CESifo.
    2. Silvia Angerer & Helena Antonie Baier & Daniela Glätzle-Rützler & Philipp Lergetporer & Thomas Rittmansberger, 2025. "Economic Preferences Predict COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions and Behavior," Munich Papers in Political Economy 37, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    3. Claude Fluet & Tim Friehe, 2024. "Optimal law enforcement when individuals are either moral or norm followers," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 26(1), February.
    4. Angerer, Silvia & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Lergetporer, Philipp & Rittmannsberger, Thomas, 2024. "Beliefs about social norms and gender-based polarization of COVID-19 vaccination readiness," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.